ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2015
Exploring the impact of providing evidence-based medicine training to service users.
Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- An auto-ethnographic study of co-produced health research in a patient organisation: unpacking the good, the bad, and the unspoken.Research involvement and engagement · 2024Article
- Enablers and barriers to evidence implementation in complementary medicine: A systematic review.Integrative medicine research · 2022Review
- Impact of patient and public (PPI) involvement in the Life After Prostate Cancer Diagnosis (LAPCD) study: a mixed-methods study.BMJ open · 2022Article
- E-Learning Material of Evidence-Based Medicine for Laypersons.Health literacy research and practice · 2022Article
- 'Getting involved in research': a co-created, co-delivered and co-analysed course for those with lived experience of health and social care services.Research involvement and engagement · 2022Article
- Smart and Age-Friendly Cities in Russia: An Exploratory Study of Attitudes, Perceptions, Quality of Life and Health Information Needs.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Evaluation of a research awareness training programme to support research involvement of older people with dementia and their care partners.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020Article
- Reporting of academic degrees in high-impact medical journals.F1000Research · 2019Article
- Learning as an outcome of involvement in research: what are the implications for practice, reporting and evaluation?Research involvement and engagement · 2019Article
- 'What can I do that will most help researchers?' A different approach to training the public at the start of their involvement in research.Research involvement and engagement · 2019Article
- Preparing researchers for patient and public involvement in scientific research: Development of a hands-on learning approach through action research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018Article
- Co-producing public involvement training with members of the public and research organisations in the East Midlands: creating, delivering and evaluating the lay assessor training programme.Research involvement and engagement · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
plain english summaryWithin health services research in the UK, there has been growing interest in evidence-based medicine (EBM) and patient and public involvement (PPI) in research. These two movements have a common goal of improving the quality and transparency of clinical decision making. So far, there has been relatively little discussion about how these two movements might relate to each other, despite their common concern. Indeed, some in the PPI movement have expressed doubts about the implications of EBM for PPI because they worry that its emphasis on evidence from clinical trials marginalises the importance of a patient's individual experiences in clinical decision making. The purpose of this paper is to examine the potential for EBM and PPI to complement one another. We analysed the feedback of 10 members of the Peninsula Public Involvement Group (PenPIG) who attended EBM workshops. These workshops trained people in the basics of EBM and were primarily attended by health professionals. We used thematic analysis, a qualitative data analysis method, to explore the responses. We found that participation in the workshops appears to have increased the ability and confidence of members of the public to actively participate as both producers and consumers of research evidence. We conclude that there is an untapped potential for EBM and PPI to complement one another in their shared desire to improve the quality and transparency of clinical decision making. ABSTRACT:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.