Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29062442›Full record

ArticleWideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques2017

Multiple plastic biliary stent placement in the management of large and multiple choledochal stones: single center experience and review of the literature.

Hasan Bektaş, Bünyamin Gürbulak, Zeynep Deniz Şahin, Yiğit Düzköylü, Şükrü Çolak, Esin Kabul Gürbulak, Mehmet Emin Güneş, Ekrem Çakar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hasan BektaşDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Bünyamin GürbulakDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Zeynep Deniz ŞahinDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Yiğit DüzköylüDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Turkiye Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Şükrü ÇolakDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Esin Kabul GürbulakDepartment of General Surgery, Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mehmet Emin GüneşDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul Esenyurt University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ekrem ÇakarDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
İstanbul Esenyurt ÜniversitesiŞişli Etfal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRTürkiye Yüksek İhtisas Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with sphincterotomy is the first step treatment modality of choledocholithiasis. In spite of an extended sphincterotomy, 10-15% of complex choledochal stones (larger than 15 mm and/or more than 3 stones) cannot be removed and recurrent ERCP procedures may be needed.

aimTo evaluate the role and efficiency of multiple biliary stent application in the treatment of large and multiple choledochal stones. MATERIAL AND

methodsPatients with complex choledochal stones and patients with inadequate choledochal clearance during ERCP were included in the study. The study group was divided into 2 groups as the placement of single (n = 27 patients) or multiple stents (n = 58 patients). After a mean time interval of 21 days (10-28), the ERCP procedure was tried for the second time and a stent was placed in case of recurrence.

resultsSuccessful biliary drainage was provided in both groups. The decrease in the longitudinal or transverse size of the stones after stent placement was found to be statistically significant in both groups (p = 0.001). Cholestatic enzymes (alkaline phosphatase (ALP), γ-glutamyltransferase (GGT)) and bilirubin levels decreased significantly in both groups following stenting (p = 0.001). Additionally, multiple stents functioned as a bridge starting from the first ERCP to full clearance in patients with large and multiple stones which could not be removed at once and saved them from the possible morbidities of an invasive operation.

conclusionsEndoscopic multiple biliary stent placement should be preferred in the treatment of patients with complex choledochal stones and high rates of co-morbidity, as a safe alternative to surgery.

Indexed as

choledocholithiasisendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)multiple plastic biliary stents

Identifiers

PMID29062442
PMCPMC5649504
OpenAlexW2738714024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.