Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29062248›Full record

ArticleTurk pediatri arsivi2017

Evaluation of

Murat Sütçü, Manolya Acar, Gonca Erköse Genç, İlknur Kökçü, Hacer Aktürk, Gürkan Atay, Selda Hançerli Törun, Nuran Salman, Zayre Erturan, Ayper Somer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turk pediatri arsivi, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. PediatricJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Candidemia in Pediatric-Clinic: Frequency of Occurrence,Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Microbiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Risk Factors for Candida Infection among Children Admitted to a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit in a Tertiary Care Centre in Southern India.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. InvasiveJournal of pediatric intensive care · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Murat SütçüDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Istanbul University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Manolya AcarDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Istanbul University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Gonca Erköse GençDepartment of Microbiology and Clinical Microbiology, Istanbul University Faculty fo Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
İlknur KökçüDepartment of Pediatrics, Istanbul University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Hacer AktürkDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Istanbul University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Gürkan AtayDepartment of Pediatrics, Istanbul University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Selda Hançerli TörunDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Istanbul University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Nuran SalmanDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Istanbul University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Zayre ErturanDepartment of Microbiology and Clinical Microbiology, Istanbul University Faculty fo Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ayper SomerDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Istanbul University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Istanbul University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimNon-albicans MATERIAL AND

methodsFifty-four Candida isolates and antifungal susceptibility results obtained from patients diagnosed as having invasive candidiasis between December 2012 and June 2016 were included. Clinical and laboratory data were retrospectively analyzed. E-test method was used in order to determine antifungal susceptibilities of

resultsThe clinical diagnoses of the patients were candidemia (n=27, 50%), catheter-related blood stream infection (n=1, 1.8%), urinary tract infection (n=13, 24%), surgical site infection (n=4, 7.4%), intraabdominal infection (n=3, 5.5%), empyema (n=2, 3.7%), and pneumonia (n=4, 7.4%). The most common isolated agent was

conclusionsIn our clinic,

Indexed as

Antifungal susceptibilitychildinvasive candidiasis

Identifiers

PMID29062248
PMCPMC5644581
OpenAlexW2598009630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.