Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29062203›Full record

ArticleVeterinary world2017

Characterization and zoonotic impact of Shiga toxin producing

Hanaa Mohamed Fadel, Rabab Afifi, Dheyazan Mohammed Al-Qabili

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary world, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Shiga Toxin-ProducingMicroorganisms · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Prevalence and Implications of Shiga Toxin-ProducingPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Migratory birds as a potential overseas transmitter of Shiga toxin-producingInternational journal of veterinary science and medicine · 2021
    Article
  12. Recent Updates on Outbreaks of Shiga Toxin-ProducingFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hanaa Mohamed FadelDepartment of Animal Hygiene and Zoonoses, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.
Rabab AfifiDepartment of Wildlife and Zoo Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.
Dheyazan Mohammed Al-QabiliDepartment of Veterinary Public Health, Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine College, Thamar University, Yemen.
Suez Canal University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimWild birds are considered silent vectors of some zoonotic water and food borne pathogens of public health significance. Owing to the importance of Shiga toxin producing MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 177 intestinal content swab samples originating from five wild bird species were investigated for the presence of

resultsA total of 30 suspect STEC isolates from 30 positive birds' samples were detected and identified on STEC CHROMagar (semi-captive pigeons, 15; house crows, 8; cattle egrets, 3; moorhens, 2; and house teals, 2). 25 isolates were grouped into 13 serogroups (O:20, O:25, O:26, O:27, O:63, O:78, O:111, O:114, O:125, O:128, O:142, O:153, and O:158), while five were rough strains. The distribution of STEC virulence genes among wild birds was as follows: 16 birds carried

conclusionsWild birds carry STEC and may add to the contamination of the surrounding environment.

Indexed as

antibioticeaerandom-amplified polymorphic DNA polymerase chain reactionShiga toxin producing Escherichia colistx1stx2wild birds

Identifiers

PMID29062203
PMCPMC5639112
OpenAlexW2760366605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.