Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29062099›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

A Novel Visceral Adiposity Index for Prediction of Type 2 Diabetes and Pre-diabetes in Chinese adults: A 5-year prospective study.

Jinshan Wu, Lilin Gong, Qifu Li, Jinbo Hu, Shuping Zhang, Yue Wang, Huang Zhou, Shuming Yang, Zhihong Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jinshan WuThe First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Department of Endocrinology, Chongqing, 400016, China.
Lilin GongThe First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Department of Endocrinology, Chongqing, 400016, China.
Qifu LiThe First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Department of Endocrinology, Chongqing, 400016, China.
Jinbo HuThe First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Department of Endocrinology, Chongqing, 400016, China.
Shuping ZhangThe First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Department of Endocrinology, Chongqing, 400016, China.
Yue WangThe First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Department of Endocrinology, Chongqing, 400016, China.
Huang ZhouThe First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Department of Endocrinology, Chongqing, 400016, China.
Shuming YangThe First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Department of Endocrinology, Chongqing, 400016, China.
Zhihong WangThe First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Department of Endocrinology, Chongqing, 400016, China. towzh713@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Chinese visceral adiposity index (CVAI) is a recently developed indicator of visceral adiposity. We investigated the predictive value of the CVAI for the development of dysglycemia (pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes) and compared its predictive power with that of the Visceral adiposity index (VAI) and various anthropometric indices. This community-based study included 2,383 participants. We assessed the predictive power of adiposity indices by performing univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analysis and calculating the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve according to their quartiles. Logistic regression analysis showed that individuals in higher CVAI quartiles at baseline were more likely to develop dysglycemia than those in lower CVAI quartiles. The area under the ROC curve for CVAI was significantly higher than that of other adiposity indices. In addition, among the various adiposity indices tested, the CVAI had the greatest Youden index for identifying dysglycemia in both genders. Our data demonstrate that the CVAI is a better predictor of type 2 diabetes and pre-diabetes than the VAI, BMI, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio and waist-to-height ratio in Chinese adults.

Indexed as

AdiposityAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChinaDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesity, AbdominalPrediabetic StatePredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesRisk FactorsROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID29062099
PMCPMC5653832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.