Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29062078›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Design and evaluation of the immunogenicity and efficacy of a biomimetic particulate formulation of viral antigens.

Victor Riitho, Adam A Walters, Satyanarayana Somavarapu, Benjamin Lamp, Till Rümenapf, Thomas Krey, Felix A Rey, Ernesto Oviedo-Orta, Graham R Stewart, Nicolas Locker and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Applications of Nanovaccines for Disease Prevention in Cattle.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Bionanotechnology for vaccine design.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2018
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Victor RiithoVirology Department, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Woodham Lane, Addlestone, KT15 3NB, United Kingdom.
Adam A WaltersVirology Department, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Woodham Lane, Addlestone, KT15 3NB, United Kingdom.
Satyanarayana SomavarapuUCL School of Pharmacy, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London, WC1N 1AX, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5361-4610
Benjamin LampInstitute for Virology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinaerplatz 1, 1210, Vienna, Austria.
Till RümenapfInstitute for Virology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinaerplatz 1, 1210, Vienna, Austria.
Thomas KreyInstitut Pasteur, Unité de Virologie Structurale, Department Virologie, Paris CNRS UMR, 3569, Paris, France.
Felix A ReyInstitut Pasteur, Unité de Virologie Structurale, Department Virologie, Paris CNRS UMR, 3569, Paris, France.
Ernesto Oviedo-OrtaFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1323-3316
Graham R StewartFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
Nicolas LockerFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
Falko SteinbachVirology Department, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Woodham Lane, Addlestone, KT15 3NB, United Kingdom.
Simon P GrahamVirology Department, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Woodham Lane, Addlestone, KT15 3NB, United Kingdom. simon.graham@pirbright.ac.uk.
Animal and Plant Health Agency · GBCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversity of Surrey · GBUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · ATInstitut Mérieux (France) · FRThe Pirbright Institute · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Subunit viral vaccines are typically not as efficient as live attenuated or inactivated vaccines at inducing protective immune responses. This paper describes an alternative 'biomimetic' technology; whereby viral antigens were formulated around a polymeric shell in a rationally arranged fashion with a surface glycoprotein coated on to the surface and non-structural antigen and adjuvant encapsulated. We evaluated this model using BVDV E2 and NS3 proteins formulated in poly-(D, L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles adjuvanted with polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid (poly(I:C) as an adjuvant (Vaccine-NP). This Vaccine-NP was compared to ovalbumin and poly(I:C) formulated in a similar manner (Control-NP) and a commercial adjuvanted inactivated BVDV vaccine (IAV), all inoculated subcutaneously and boosted prior to BVDV-1 challenge. Significant virus-neutralizing activity, and E2 and NS3 specific antibodies were observed in both Vaccine-NP and IAV groups following the booster immunisation. IFN-γ responses were observed in ex vivo PBMC stimulated with E2 and NS3 proteins in both vaccinated groups. We observed that the protection afforded by the particulate vaccine was comparable to the licenced IAV formulation. In conclusion, the biomimetic particulates showed a promising immunogenicity and efficacy profile that may be improved by virtue of being a customisable mode of delivery.

Indexed as

Drug DesignAntigens, ViralBiomimetic MaterialsDose-Response Relationship, ImmunologicDrug CompoundingHumansInterferon-gammaPolylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid CopolymerT-LymphocytesVaccinationAntigens, ViralInterferon-gammaPolylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid Copolymer

Identifiers

PMID29062078
PMCPMC5653838
OpenAlexW2766579086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.