Observational studyThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2017
Identifying people with a learning disability: an advanced search for general practice.
Observational study in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Access to preventive health assessments for people with intellectual disability: a systematic scoping review informed by the Levesque Access Framework.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Care needs of chronically ill patients with intellectual disabilities in Dutch general practice: patients' and providers' perspectives.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Tiny teeth in terrified tots - what is the global prevalence of paediatric dental fear and anxiety?Evidence-based dentistry · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Primary mental healthcare for adults with mild intellectual disabilities: a Dutch database study.The European journal of general practice · 2022Article
- A Scoping Review of Approaches to Improving Quality of Data Relating to Health Inequalities.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Breaking the cycle of inequalities for people with a learning disability.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022Article
- Incidence of fractures in people with intellectual disabilities over the life course: a retrospective matched cohort study.EClinicalMedicine · 2022Article
- Learning disability registers: known unknowns and unknown unknowns.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021Article
- Characterizing adults with Type 2 diabetes mellitus and intellectual disability: outcomes of a case-finding study.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2018Article
- Improving knowledge of psychotropic prescribing in people with Intellectual Disability in primary care.PloS one · 2018Article
- Health Promotion and Wellness Initiatives Targeting Chronic Disease Prevention and Management for Adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: Recent Advancements in Type 2 Diabetes.Current developmental disorders reports · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPeople with learning disabilities (LD) have poor physical and mental health when compared with the general population. They are also likely to find it more difficult than others to describe their symptoms adequately. It is therefore harder for healthcare workers to identify the health needs of those with learning disabilities, with the danger of some problems being left unrecognised. Practice registers record only a proportion of those who are eligible, making it difficult to target improvements in their health care.
aimTo test a Read Code search supporting the identification of people with a mild-to-moderate learning disability who are not currently on the learning disability register. DESIGN AND
settingAn observational study in primary care in West Yorkshire.
methodRead Code searches were created to identify individuals with a learning disability not on the LD register; they were field tested and further refined before testing in general practice.
resultsDiagnostic codes identified small numbers of individuals who should have been on the LD register. Functional and service use codes often created large numbers of false-positive results. The specific descriptive codes 'Learning difficulties' and 'Referral to learning disability team' needed follow-up review, and then identified some individuals with LD who were not on the register.
conclusionThe Read Code search supported practices to populate their registers and was quick to run and review, making it a viable choice to support register revalidation. However, it did not find large numbers of people eligible for the LD register who were previously unidentified by their practice, suggesting that additional complementary methods are required to support practices to validate their registers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.