Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29061600›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

Global research trends in spinal ultrasound: a systematic bibliometric analysis.

Xiao Zhai, Jin Cui, Jie Shao, Qijin Wang, Xiao Chen, Xianzhao Wei, Xiaoyi Zhou, Ziqiang Chen, Yushu Bai, Ming Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xiao ZhaiDepartment of Orthopedics, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Jin CuiDepartment of Orthopedics, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Jie ShaoDepartment of Orthopedics, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Qijin WangDepartment of Endocrinology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Xiao ChenDepartment of Orthopedics, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Xianzhao WeiDepartment of Orthopedics, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3439-168X
Xiaoyi ZhouDepartment of Orthopedics, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Ziqiang ChenDepartment of Orthopedics, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Yushu BaiDepartment of Orthopedics, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Ming LiDepartment of Orthopedics, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, there has been increased interest in the use of ultrasound technology in the evaluation of spinal and paraspinal regions.

objectiveThis study aimed to investigate trends in spinal ultrasound research from 1994 to 2015 and compare the contributions of such research from different countries and authors. STUDY

designBibliometric analysis.

settingPublications related to spinal ultrasound from 1994 to 2015 were retrieved from the Web of Science database.

methodsExcel 2013, GraphPad Prism 5, and VOSviewer were used to summarise bibliometric features, including the number of publications, citation frequency, H-index, and country contributions and hotspots (keywords of popular scientific fields).

resultsA total of 3859 papers were included. The global inflection point (the point in time when the publication growth rate moved from positive to negative) came in 2010. The United States contributed the largest percentage of articles (1041; 26.9%), with the most citations (19 848) and the highest H-index (61). The journals

conclusionSpinal ultrasound literature has grown continuously over the last 22 years, with the rate slowing down after 2010. The United States was the largest contributor in this field. Recent studies on topics related to 'adolescent idiopathic scoliosis' and 'anaesthesia' were relatively new and should be closely followed in spinal ultrasound research.

Indexed as

BibliometricsUltrasonographyBiomedical ResearchHumansSpinal DiseasesSpineadolescent idiopathic scoliosisanaesthesiabibliometricspineultrasound

Identifiers

PMID29061600
PMCPMC5665321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.