ReviewThe Journal of urology2018
Personalized Intervention in Monogenic Stone Formers.
Review in The Journal of urology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role and relevance of genetic testing in patients with kidney stones: a review from EAU Section of Endourology.Current opinion in urology · 2026Review
- Personalised prevention and management of kidney stones: a narrative review on the importance of integrating environmental, social and genetic factors.Public health reviews · 2026Review
- Article
- Genetics of kidney stones and the role of genetic testing in prevention: a guide for urologists.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Nephrolithiasis.Advances in kidney disease and health · 2024Review
- Prevalence and characteristics of genetic disease in adult kidney stone formers.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2024Article
- Genetic susceptibility of urolithiasis: comprehensive results from genome-wide analysis.World journal of urology · 2024Article
- Monogenic features of urolithiasis: A comprehensive review.Asian journal of urology · 2024Review
- Research progress on renal calculus associate with inborn error of metabolism.Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2023Review
- Comparison between prone and supine nephrolithotomy in pediatric population: a double center experience.International urology and nephrology · 2022Article
- A comparison of the clinical characteristics of pediatric urolithiasis patients with positive and negative molecular diagnoses.World journal of urology · 2022Article
- Clinical characterization of primary hyperoxaluria type 3 in comparison with types 1 and 2.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2022Article
- The genetics of kidney stone disease and nephrocalcinosis.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2022Review
- Integration of exome sequencing and metabolic evaluation for the diagnosis of children with urolithiasis.World journal of urology · 2021Article
- Pediatric stone disease: Current management and future concepts.Turkish archives of pediatrics · 2021Review
- Precision medicine in renal stone-formers.Urolithiasis · 2019Review
- Empiric therapy for kidney stones.Urolithiasis · 2019Review
- Absence of the sulfate transporter SAT-1 has no impact on oxalate handling by mouse intestine and does not cause hyperoxaluria or hyperoxalemia.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2019Article
- The current status of preventive measures for urinary calculi in children.Therapeutic advances in urologyReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTreatment of a first-time renal stone consists of acute management followed by medical efforts to prevent stone recurrence. Although nephrolithiasis is roughly 50% heritable, the presence of a family history usually does not affect treatment since most stone disease is regarded as polygenic, ie not attributable to a single gene. Recent evidence has suggested that single mutations could be responsible for a larger proportion of renal stones than previously thought. This intriguing possibility holds the potential to change the management paradigm in stone prevention from metabolically directed therapy to more specific approaches informed by genetic screening and testing. This review synthesizes new findings concerning monogenic kidney stone disease, and provides a concise and clinically useful reference for monogenic causes. It is expected that increased awareness of these etiologies will lead to increased use of genetic testing in recurrent stone formers and further research into the prevalence of monogenic stone disease. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe assembled a complete list of genes known to cause or influence nephrolithiasis based on recent reviews and commentaries. We then comprehensively searched PubMed® and Google Scholar™ for all research on each gene having a pertinent role in nephrolithiasis. We determined which genes could be considered monogenic causes of nephrolithiasis. One gene, ALPL, was excluded since nephrolithiasis is a relatively minor aspect of the disorder associated with the gene (hypophosphatasia). We summarized selected studies and assembled clinically relevant details.
resultsA total of 27 genes were reviewed in terms of recent findings, mode of inheritance of stone disease, known or supposed prevalence of mutations in the general population of stone patients and specific therapies or considerations.
conclusionsThere is a distinct opportunity for increased use of genetic testing to improve the lives of pediatric and adult stone patients. Several genes first reported in association with rare disease may be loci for novel mutations, heterozygous disease and forme frustes as causes of stones in the broader population. Cases of idiopathic nephrolithiasis should be considered as potentially having a monogenic basis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.