ArticleBehavioural brain research2018
Principal component analysis and neural predictors of emotion regulation.
Article in Behavioural brain research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Classification of bipolar disorders using the multilayer modularity in dynamic minimum spanning tree from resting state fMRI.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2023Article
- Binge Eating (BE) and Obesity: Brain Activity and Psychological Measures before and after Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB).Nutrients · 2023Article
- Should we keep some distance from distancing? Regulatory and post-regulatory effects of emotion downregulation.PloS one · 2021Article
- Distinct neural engagement during implicit and explicit regulation of negative stimuli.Neuropsychologia · 2020Article
- Principal component analysis and brain-based predictors of emotion regulation in anxiety and depression.Psychological medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reappraisal, a cognitive approach intended to alter an emotional response, is generally associated with prefrontal cortical recruitment and decreased limbic activity. However, the extent to which neurofunctional activity predicts successful reappraisal is unclear. During fMRI, 60 healthy participants completed a reappraisal paradigm, which included reappraising negative images to reduce emotional reactivity ('ReappNeg') and viewing negative images and experiencing the negative affect they evoke ('LookNeg'). After each trial, participants rated their emotional response on a Likert-type scale where higher values indicated more negative affect. Reappraisal ability was based on a difference value (ΔReappNeg-LookNeg) such that negative values signified successful reappraisal ('SR'; n=38) and positive values, unsuccessful reappraisal ('USR'; n=22). Neural activity based on ReappNeg-LookNeg conditions from 37 regions of interest encompassing cortical and limbic areas was submitted to Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Resulting PCA factors were submitted to discriminant function analysis to evaluate which factor(s) predicted SR and USR groups. Results showed a factor with high loadings for certain frontal areas (e.g., left dorsomedial prefrontal cortex) and limbic regions (e.g., bilateral amygdala) predicted 71.1% of cases in the SR group and 68.2% of cases in the USR group. Additionally, successful reappraisal corresponded with more activation in the factor with high loadings for frontal areas and less activity in the factor associated with limbic regions. Results are consistent with studies of individual differences where more prefrontal engagement and less limbic activity is associated with effectual reappraisal, but for the first time, a neural 'signature' for successful reappraisal has been demonstrated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.