Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29061386›Full record

ArticleBehavioural brain research2018

Principal component analysis and neural predictors of emotion regulation.

Heide Klumpp, Runa Bhaumik, Kerry L Kinney, Jacklynn M Fitzgerald

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural brain research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Heide KlumppDepartment of Psychiatry (HK, RB), University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States; Department of Psychology (HK, KLK), University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States. Electronic address: hklumpp@psych.uic.edu.
Runa BhaumikDepartment of Psychiatry (HK, RB), University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Kerry L KinneyDepartment of Psychology (HK, KLK), University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Jacklynn M FitzgeraldDepartment of Psychology (JMF), University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, United States.

Funding

Strengthening Stakeholder Engagement in Human Research Protections.UL1TR002003 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI KARNIK, NIRANJAN SUBHASH, MERMELSTEIN, ROBIN J. · 2016 to 2024
$33.7M
CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR029879 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI MAZZONE, THEODORE · 2009 to 2011
$11.0M
Negative Valence Brain Targets and Predictors of Anxiety and Depression TreatmentR01MH101497 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI PHAN, K. LUAN · 2013 to 2016
$2.6M
Brain Mechanisms of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Social Anxiety DisorderK23MH093679 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI KLUMPP, HEIDE · 2012 to 2016
$948k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002003NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR029879NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH093679NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH101497
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reappraisal, a cognitive approach intended to alter an emotional response, is generally associated with prefrontal cortical recruitment and decreased limbic activity. However, the extent to which neurofunctional activity predicts successful reappraisal is unclear. During fMRI, 60 healthy participants completed a reappraisal paradigm, which included reappraising negative images to reduce emotional reactivity ('ReappNeg') and viewing negative images and experiencing the negative affect they evoke ('LookNeg'). After each trial, participants rated their emotional response on a Likert-type scale where higher values indicated more negative affect. Reappraisal ability was based on a difference value (ΔReappNeg-LookNeg) such that negative values signified successful reappraisal ('SR'; n=38) and positive values, unsuccessful reappraisal ('USR'; n=22). Neural activity based on ReappNeg-LookNeg conditions from 37 regions of interest encompassing cortical and limbic areas was submitted to Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Resulting PCA factors were submitted to discriminant function analysis to evaluate which factor(s) predicted SR and USR groups. Results showed a factor with high loadings for certain frontal areas (e.g., left dorsomedial prefrontal cortex) and limbic regions (e.g., bilateral amygdala) predicted 71.1% of cases in the SR group and 68.2% of cases in the USR group. Additionally, successful reappraisal corresponded with more activation in the factor with high loadings for frontal areas and less activity in the factor associated with limbic regions. Results are consistent with studies of individual differences where more prefrontal engagement and less limbic activity is associated with effectual reappraisal, but for the first time, a neural 'signature' for successful reappraisal has been demonstrated.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAffectBrainBrain MappingCognitionEmotionsFemaleFunctional NeuroimagingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePrincipal Component AnalysisYoung AdultClassificationCognitive reappraisalEmotionfMRIFrontalLimbicNeuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID29061386
PMCPMC5815323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.