Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29061311›Full record

Trial reportAtencion primaria2019

Efficacy of high doses of penicillin versus amoxicillin in the treatment of uncomplicated community acquired pneumonia in adults. A non-inferiority controlled clinical trial.

Carl Llor, Almudena Pérez, Eugenia Carandell, Anna García-Sangenís, Javier Rezola, Marian Llorente, Salvador Gestoso, Francesc Bobé, Miguel Román-Rodríguez, Josep M Cots and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readEquivalence TrialMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Atencion primaria, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carl LlorPrimary Care Centre Via Roma, Barcelona, Spain. Electronic address: carles.llor@gmail.com.
Almudena PérezPrimary Care Centre La Marina, Barcelona, Spain.
Eugenia CarandellPrimary Care Centre Son Pisà, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Anna García-SangenísInstitut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol, Barcelona, Spain.
Javier RezolaPrimary Care Centre Son Pisà, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Marian LlorentePrimary Care Centre Son Pisà, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Salvador GestosoPrimary Care Centre Son Pisà, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Francesc BobéPrimary Care Centre Jaume I, Tarragona, Spain.
Miguel Román-RodríguezPrimary Care Centre Son Pisà, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Josep M CotsPrimary Care Centre La Marina, Barcelona, Spain.
Silvia HernándezPrimary Care Centre Jaume I, Tarragona, Spain.
Jordi CortésInstitut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol, Barcelona, Spain.
Marc MiravitllesPneumology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, CIBER de Enfemedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Barcelona, Spain.
Rosa MorrosInstitut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol, Barcelona, Spain.
Hospital Son Llatzer · ESInstitut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol · ESCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCommunity-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is treated with penicillin in some northern European countries.

objectivesTo evaluate whether high-dose penicillin V is as effective as high-dose amoxicillin for the treatment of non-severe CAP.

designMulticentre, parallel, double-blind, controlled, randomized clinical trial.

setting31 primary care centers in Spain.

participantsPatients from 18 to 75 years of age with no significant associated comorbidity and with symptoms of lower respiratory tract infection and radiological confirmation of CAP were randomized to receive either penicillin V 1.6 million units, or amoxicillin 1000mg three times per day for 10 days. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: The main outcome was clinical cure at 14 days, and the primary hypothesis was that penicillin V would be non-inferior to amoxicillin with regard to this outcome, with a margin of 15% for the difference in proportions. EudraCT register 2012-003511-63.

resultsA total of 43 subjects (amoxicillin: 28; penicillin: 15) were randomized. Clinical cure was observed in 10 (90.9%) patients assigned to penicillin and in 25 (100%) patients assigned to amoxicillin with a difference of -9.1% (95% CI, -41.3% to 6.4%; p=.951) for non-inferiority. In the intention-to-treat analysis, amoxicillin was found to be 28.6% superior to penicillin (95% CI, 7.3-58.1%; p=.009 for superiority). The number of adverse events was similar in both groups.

conclusionsThere was a trend favoring high-dose amoxicillin versus high-dose penicillin in adults with uncomplicated CAP. The main limitation of this trial was the low statistical power due to the low number of patients included.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAmoxicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsCommunity-Acquired InfectionsDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPenicillin VPneumoniaProspective StudiesSpainTreatment OutcomeAmoxicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsPenicillin VAdultosAdultsAmoxicilinaAmoxicillinCommunity-acquired pneumoniaEnsayo clínico aleatorizadoNeumonía adquirida en la comunidadPenicilinaPenicillinRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID29061311
PMCPMC6836912
OpenAlexW2765313460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.