Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29061183›Full record

Trial reportNutrition journal2017

The effects of EPA and DHA enriched fish oil on nutritional and immunological markers of treatment naïve breast cancer patients: a randomized double-blind controlled trial.

Elemárcia Martins da Silva Paixão, Ana Carolina de M Oliveira, Nathalia Pizato, Maria Imaculada Muniz-Junqueira, Kelly G Magalhães, Eduardo Yoshio Nakano, Marina K Ito

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrition journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Cancer cachexia: molecular basis and therapeutic advances.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Abnormal changes in metabolites caused by mJournal of advanced research · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elemárcia Martins da Silva PaixãoPost Graduate Program in Human Nutrition, University of Brasília, Brasilia, Federal District, 70910-900, Brazil. e.paixao@yahoo.com.br.
Ana Carolina de M OliveiraPost Graduate Program in Human Nutrition, University of Brasília, Brasilia, Federal District, 70910-900, Brazil.
Nathalia PizatoPost Graduate Program in Human Nutrition, University of Brasília, Brasilia, Federal District, 70910-900, Brazil.
Maria Imaculada Muniz-JunqueiraLaboratory of Cellular Immunology, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, Federal District, 70910-900, Brazil.
Kelly G MagalhãesLaboratory of Immunology and Inflammation, Department of Cell Biology, Institute of Biology, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, Federal District, 70910-900, Brazil.
Eduardo Yoshio NakanoDepartment of Statistics, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, Federal District, 70910-900, Brazil.
Marina K ItoPost Graduate Program in Human Nutrition, University of Brasília, Brasilia, Federal District, 70910-900, Brazil.
Universidade de Brasília · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe evaluated the effects of eicosapentaenoic (EPA) and docosahexaenoic (DHA) acids enriched fish oil (FO) on nutritional and immunological parameters of treatment naïve breast cancer patients.

methodsIn a randomized double blind controlled trial, the FO group (FG) patients were supplemented with 2 g/ day of FO concentrate containing 1.8 g of n-3 fatty acids during 30 days. The placebo group (PG) received 2 g/ day of mineral oil. At baseline and after the intervention, plasma levels of n-3 fatty acids, dietary intake, weight, body composition, biochemical and immunological markers were assessed.

resultsAt the end of the intervention period, no between group differences were observed regarding anthropometric parameters. There was a significant increase in the plasma phospholipid EPA (p = 0.004), DHA (p = 0.007) of the FG patients. In FG patients the percentages of peripheral blood CD4

conclusionsSupplementation of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients with EPA and DHA led to a significant change in the composition of plasma fatty acids, maintained the level of CD4

trial registrationBrazilian Clinical Trials Registry (REBEC): RBR-2b2hqh. Registered 29 April 2013, retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBiomarkersBreast NeoplasmsCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesC-Reactive ProteinCytokinesDietDinoprostoneDocosahexaenoic AcidsDouble-Blind MethodEicosapentaenoic AcidFemaleFish OilsHumansBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinCytokinesDinoprostoneDocosahexaenoic AcidsEicosapentaenoic AcidFish OilsBreast cancerCytokinesEicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)Fish oilImmunonutritionN-3 fatty acids

Identifiers

PMID29061183
PMCPMC5653994
OpenAlexW2766647429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.