Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29061167›Full record

ArticleEpigenetics & chromatin2017

Genome-wide profiling of transcribed enhancers during macrophage activation.

Elena Denisenko, Reto Guler, Musa M Mhlanga, Harukazu Suzuki, Frank Brombacher, Sebastian Schmeier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epigenetics & chromatin, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Innate Immune Memory in Macrophages.Newborn (Clarksville, Md.)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Elena DenisenkoInstitute of Natural and Mathematical Sciences, Massey University, Albany, Auckland, 0632, New Zealand.
Reto GulerDivision of Immunology, Institute of Infectious Diseases and Molecular Medicine (IDM), South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) Immunology of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, 7925, South Africa.
Musa M MhlangaGene Expression and Biophysics Group, CSIR Synthetic Biology ERA, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa.
Harukazu SuzukiDivision of Genomic Technologies, RIKEN Center for Life Science Technologies, 1-7-22 Suehiro-cho, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, 230-0045, Japan.
Frank BrombacherDivision of Immunology, Institute of Infectious Diseases and Molecular Medicine (IDM), South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) Immunology of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, 7925, South Africa.
Sebastian SchmeierInstitute of Natural and Mathematical Sciences, Massey University, Albany, Auckland, 0632, New Zealand. s.schmeier@massey.ac.nz.ORCID 0000-0002-3947-8226
Massey University · NZSouth African Medical Research Council · ZAUniversity of Lisbon · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMacrophages are sentinel cells essential for tissue homeostasis and host defence. Owing to their plasticity, macrophages acquire a range of functional phenotypes in response to microenvironmental stimuli, of which M(IFN-γ) and M(IL-4/IL-13) are well known for their opposing pro- and anti-inflammatory roles. Enhancers have emerged as regulatory DNA elements crucial for transcriptional activation of gene expression.

resultsUsing cap analysis of gene expression and epigenetic data, we identify on large-scale transcribed enhancers in bone marrow-derived mouse macrophages, their time kinetics, and target protein-coding genes. We observe an increase in target gene expression, concomitant with increasing numbers of associated enhancers, and find that genes associated with many enhancers show a shift towards stronger enrichment for macrophage-specific biological processes. We infer enhancers that drive transcriptional responses of genes upon M(IFN-γ) and M(IL-4/IL-13) macrophage activation and demonstrate stimuli specificity of regulatory associations. Finally, we show that enhancer regions are enriched for binding sites of inflammation-related transcription factors, suggesting a link between stimuli response and enhancer transcriptional control.

conclusionsOur study provides new insights into genome-wide enhancer-mediated transcriptional control of macrophage genes, including those implicated in macrophage activation, and offers a detailed genome-wide catalogue of transcribed enhancers in bone marrow-derived mouse macrophages.

Indexed as

Enhancer Elements, GeneticTranscriptional ActivationAnimalsCell LineGenomeMacrophage ActivationMiceProtein BindingTranscription FactorsTranscription FactorseRNAMacrophage activationTranscriptional enhancersTranscriptional regulation

Identifiers

PMID29061167
PMCPMC5654053
OpenAlexW2765730679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.