Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29061161›Full record

Trial reportBMC research notes2017

Using a genetic/clinical risk score to stop smoking (GeTSS): randomised controlled trial.

John A A Nichols, Paul Grob, Wendy Kite, Peter Williams, Simon de Lusignan

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC research notes, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01176383 (A Protocol for an Randomised Controlled Trial of Smoking Cessation Success Rate With or Without a Genetic Test, "Respiragene", to Assess Lung Cancer Risk - an Exploratory Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01176383 nacompletednot on this map

A Protocol for an Randomised Controlled Trial of Smoking Cessation Success Rate With or Without a Genetic Test, "Respiragene", to Assess Lung Cancer Risk - an Exploratory Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorSussex NHS Research ConsortiumRan2011 to 2013Enrolled67ConditionsSmoking CessationArmsRespiragene test and risk score
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Strategies to improve smoking cessation rates in primary care.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Attitudes toward Precision Treatment of Smoking in the Southern Community Cohort Study.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John A A NicholsDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, UK. drjaan@ntlworld.com.
Paul GrobDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, UK.
Wendy Kite, Jardim De Bensafrim, Lote 8, Bensafrim, 8600 069, Argave, Portugal.
Peter WilliamsDepartment of Mathematics, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU27XH, UK.
Simon de LusignanDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, UK.
University of Surrey · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs genetic tests become cheaper, the possibility of their widespread availability must be considered. This study involves a risk score for lung cancer in smokers that is roughly 50% genetic (50% clinical criteria). The risk score has been shown to be effective as a smoking cessation motivator in hospital recruited subjects (not actively seeking cessation services).

methodsThis was an RCT set in a United Kingdom National Health Service (NHS) smoking cessation clinic. Smokers were identified from medical records. Subjects that wanted to participate were randomised to a test group that was administered a gene-based risk test and given a lung cancer risk score, or a control group where no risk score was performed. Each group had 8 weeks of weekly smoking cessation sessions involving group therapy and advice on smoking cessation pharmacotherapy and follow-up at 6 months. The primary endpoint was smoking cessation at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included ranking of the risk score and other motivators.

results67 subjects attended the smoking cessation clinic. The 6 months quit rates were 29.4%, (10/34; 95% CI 14.1-44.7%) for the test group and 42.9% (12/28; 95% CI 24.6-61.2%) for the controls. The difference is not significant. However, the quit rate for test group subjects with a "very high" risk score was 89% (8/9; 95% CI 68.4-100%) which was significant when compared with the control group (p = 0.023) and test group subjects with moderate risk scores had a 9.5% quit rate (2/21; 95% CI 2.7-28.9%) which was significantly lower than for above moderate risk score 61.5% (8/13; 95% CI 35.5-82.3; p = 0.03).

conclusionsOnly the sub-group with the highest risk score showed an increased quit rate. Controls and test group subjects with a moderate risk score were relatively unlikely to have achieved and maintained non-smoker status at 6 months. ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT01176383 (date of registration: 3 August 2010).

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGenetic TestingHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentSmoking CessationUnited KingdomYoung AdultGenetic testingLung neoplasmsPrimary health careSmoking cessation

Identifiers

PMID29061161
PMCPMC5653992
OpenAlexW2765816477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.