Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29060424›Full record

ArticleAnnual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference2017

Combination of static and temporal data analysis to predict mortality and readmission in the intensive care.

Janani Venugopalan, Nikhil Chanani, Kevin Maher, May D Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Early Hospital Mortality Prediction using Vital Signals.Smart health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Janani Venugopalan
Nikhil Chanani
Kevin Maher
May D Wang

Funding

Atlanta Clinical and Translational Science Institute (ACTSI) RenewalUL1TR000454 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHENS, DAVID S · 2012 to 2016
$25.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are approximately 4 million intensive care unit (ICU) admissions each year in the United States with costs accounting for 4.1% of national health expenditures. Unforeseen adverse events contribute disproportionately to these costs. Thus, there has been substantial research in developing clinical decision support systems to predict and improve ICU outcomes such as ICU mortality, prolonged length of stay, and ICU readmission. However, the data in the ICU is collected at diverse time intervals and includes both static and temporal data. Common methods for static data mining such as Cox and logistic regression and methods for temporal data analysis such as temporal association rule mining do not model the combination of both static and temporal data. This work aims to overcome this challenge to combine static models such as logistic regression and feedforward neural networks with temporal models such as conditional random fields(CRF). We demonstrate the results using adult patient records from a publicly available database called Multi-parameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care - II (MIMIC-II). We show that the combination models outperformed individual models of logistic regression, feed-forward neural networks and conditional random fields in predicting ICU mortality. The combination models also outperform the static models of logistic regression and feed-forward neural networks for the prediction of 30 day ICU readmissions when tested using Matthews correlation coefficient and accuracy as the metrics.

Indexed as

Patient ReadmissionCritical CareHumansIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayLogistic ModelsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID29060424
PMCPMC7370856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.