Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29059426›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the National Cancer Institute2017

Tumor Microvessel Density as a Potential Predictive Marker for Bevacizumab Benefit: GOG-0218 Biomarker Analyses.

Carlos Bais, Barbara Mueller, Mark F Brady, Robert S Mannel, Robert A Burger, Wei Wei, Koen M Marien, Mark M Kockx, Amreen Husain, Michael J Birrer and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Final Overall Survival of a Randomized Trial of Bevacizumab for Primary Treatment of Ovarian Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2019
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Current Role of Antiangiogenics in Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Advances in Systemic Therapy for Ovarian Cancer Over the Past Decade: A Clinical and Molecular Perspective.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The serum LDH level and KELIM scores are potential predictors of a benefit from bevacizumab first-line therapy for patients with advanced ovarian cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Carlos BaisGenentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA; F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland; NRG Statistical and Data Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Center for Cancer Research, Gillette Center for Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; HistoGeneX NV, Antwerp, Belgium; Division of Physiopharmacology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Barbara MuellerGenentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA; F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland; NRG Statistical and Data Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Center for Cancer Research, Gillette Center for Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; HistoGeneX NV, Antwerp, Belgium; Division of Physiopharmacology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Mark F BradyGenentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA; F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland; NRG Statistical and Data Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Center for Cancer Research, Gillette Center for Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; HistoGeneX NV, Antwerp, Belgium; Division of Physiopharmacology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Robert S MannelGenentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA; F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland; NRG Statistical and Data Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Center for Cancer Research, Gillette Center for Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; HistoGeneX NV, Antwerp, Belgium; Division of Physiopharmacology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Robert A BurgerGenentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA; F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland; NRG Statistical and Data Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Center for Cancer Research, Gillette Center for Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; HistoGeneX NV, Antwerp, Belgium; Division of Physiopharmacology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Wei WeiGenentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA; F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland; NRG Statistical and Data Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Center for Cancer Research, Gillette Center for Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; HistoGeneX NV, Antwerp, Belgium; Division of Physiopharmacology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Koen M MarienGenentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA; F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland; NRG Statistical and Data Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Center for Cancer Research, Gillette Center for Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; HistoGeneX NV, Antwerp, Belgium; Division of Physiopharmacology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Mark M KockxGenentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA; F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland; NRG Statistical and Data Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Center for Cancer Research, Gillette Center for Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; HistoGeneX NV, Antwerp, Belgium; Division of Physiopharmacology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Amreen HusainGenentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA; F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland; NRG Statistical and Data Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Center for Cancer Research, Gillette Center for Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; HistoGeneX NV, Antwerp, Belgium; Division of Physiopharmacology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Michael J BirrerGenentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA; F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland; NRG Statistical and Data Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Center for Cancer Research, Gillette Center for Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; HistoGeneX NV, Antwerp, Belgium; Division of Physiopharmacology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group
Center for Cancer Research · USHistoGeneX (Belgium) · BEMassachusetts General Hospital · USOklahoma City University · USRoche (Switzerland) · CHRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USUniversity of Antwerp · BEUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Lead Academic Participating Site for the Development and Conduct of NCTN TrialsU10CA180798 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI MANNEL, ROBERT S., MOORE, KATHLEEN N. · 2014 to 2018
$6.7M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180798
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Combining bevacizumab with frontline chemotherapy statistically significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) but not overall survival (OS) in the phase III GOG-0218 trial. Evaluation of candidate biomarkers was an exploratory objective. Methods: Patients with stage III (incompletely resected) or IV ovarian cancer were randomly assigned to receive six chemotherapy cycles with placebo or bevacizumab followed by single-agent placebo or bevacizumab. Five candidate tumor biomarkers were assessed by immunohistochemistry. The biomarker-evaluable population was categorized into high or low biomarker-expressing subgroups using median and quartile cutoffs. Associations between biomarker expression and efficacy were analyzed. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: The biomarker-evaluable population (n = 980) comprising 78.5% of the intent-to-treat population had representative baseline characteristics and efficacy outcomes. Neither prognostic nor predictive associations were seen for vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor-2, neuropilin-1, or MET. Higher microvessel density (MVD; measured by CD31) showed predictive value for PFS (hazard ratio [HR] for bevacizumab vs placebo = 0.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.29 to 0.54, vs 0.80, 95% CI = 0.59 to 1.07, for high vs low MVD, respectively, P interaction = .003) and OS (HR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.51 to 0.88, vs 1.10, 95% CI = 0.84 to 1.44, P interaction = .02). Tumor VEGF-A was not predictive for PFS but showed potential predictive value for OS using a third-quartile cutoff for high VEGF-A expression. Conclusions: These retrospective tumor biomarker analyses suggest a positive association between density of vascular endothelial cells (the predominant cell type expressing VEGF receptors) and tumor VEGF-A levels and magnitude of bevacizumab effect in ovarian cancer. The potential predictive value of MVD (CD31) and tumor VEGF-A is consistent with a mechanism of action driven by VEGF-A signaling blockade.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabBiomarkers, TumorCarboplatinConfidence IntervalsDisease-Free SurvivalDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansIntention to Treat AnalysisMicrovesselsAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabBiomarkers, TumorCarboplatinMET protein, humanNeuropilin-1PaclitaxelPlatelet Endothelial Cell Adhesion Molecule-1Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-metVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2

Identifiers

PMID29059426
PMCPMC5440032
OpenAlexW2620065392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.