Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29059367›Full record

Trial reportNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2018

Nicotine Metabolism-informed Care for Smoking Cessation: A Pilot Precision RCT.

Quinn S Wells, Matthew S Freiberg, Robert A Greevy, Rachel F Tyndale, Suman Kundu, Meredith S Duncan, Stephen King, Lesa Abney, Elizabeth Scoville, Dawn B Beaulieu and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Can Treatment Support Mitigate Nicotine Metabolism-Based Disparities in Smoking Abstinence? Secondary Analysis of the Helping HAND 4 Trial.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Exploring Potential for a Personalized Medicine Approach to Smoking Cessation With an American Indian Tribe.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023
    Article
  9. Dispositional optimism and optimistic bias: Associations with cessation motivation, confidence, and attitudes.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Attitudes toward Precision Treatment of Smoking in the Southern Community Cohort Study.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2019
    Article
  16. Most Current Smokers Desire Genetic Susceptibility Testing and Genetically-Efficacious Medication.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2018
    Observational
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Quinn S WellsDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Matthew S FreibergDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Robert A GreevyDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Rachel F TyndaleCampbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Departments of Psychiatry, Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Suman KunduDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Meredith S DuncanDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Stephen KingDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Lesa AbneyDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Elizabeth ScovilleDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Dawn B BeaulieuDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Vanessa GatskieDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Hilary A TindleDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · USCentre for Addiction and Mental Health · CA

Funding

The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)UL1TR000445 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000445
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Varenicline doubles cessation over nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) patch for "normal," but not "slow," nicotine metabolizers, as assessed by the nicotine metabolite ratio (NMR). Metabolism-informed care (MIC) could improve outcomes by matching normal metabolizers with non-nicotine medication (e.g., varenicline) and slow metabolizers with NRT patch. Methods: We conducted a feasibility randomized controlled trial of MIC versus guideline based care (GBC) among 81 outpatient adult daily smokers with medical comorbidity. Participants reported perceptions of MIC, underwent blood draw for NMR, and received expert cessation counseling. For MIC participants, medication selection was informed by NMR result (normal (≥0.31) vs. slow (< 0.31)). The primary outcome was MIC feasibility, reflected by attitudes toward MIC and by match rates between NMR and medication. Secondary endpoints (cessation confidence, medication use, smoking status) were assessed over 6 months to inform future studies. Results: Participants were median age 53 years, 46% female, 28% black, and ~90% endorsed MIC. Despite high varenicline prescription rates (~60%) in both arms, NMR-medication matching was higher in MIC (84%) versus GBC (58%) participants (p=0.02); unadjusted odds ratio (OR) 3.67, 95% confidence interval [1.33, 11.00; p-value=0.02]. Secondary endpoints were similar at 1, 3, and 6 months. Conclusions: MIC, an NMR-based precision approach to smoking cessation, was acceptable to 90% of smokers and improved NMR-medication match rates more than 3-fold compared to GBC, even with generally high use of varenicline. These data support the feasibility of MIC, which could maximize efficacy of smoking cessation medication while minimizing side effects and cost. Implications: Among treatment-seeking daily smokers with medical comorbidity, most viewed metabolism-informed care (MIC), guided by the nicotine metabolism ratio (NMR), favorably, and were willing to accept MIC-guided medication. Compared to GBC participants (58%), more MIC participants (84%) were prescribed NMR-matched medication (i.e., normal metabolizers received varenicline; slow metabolizers received NRT patch). MIC increased the odds of optimized matching between NMR and medication more than 3-fold over GBC. Because the number needed to treat (NNT) to help one normal metabolizer quit smoking is only 4.9 for varenicline versus 26 for patch, broad implementation of MIC will improve drug efficacy in normal metabolizers as well as minimize side effects in slow metabolizers.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNicotineNicotinic AgonistsPilot ProjectsPrecision MedicineSmoking CessationSmoking Cessation AgentsTobacco SmokingTobacco Use Cessation DevicesVareniclineNicotineNicotinic AgonistsSmoking Cessation AgentsVarenicline

Identifiers

PMID29059367
PMCPMC6236077
OpenAlexW2761210948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.