Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29059332›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanical engineering2018

Combining IVUS and Optical Coherence Tomography for More Accurate Coronary Cap Thickness Quantification and Stress/Strain Calculations: A Patient-Specific Three-Dimensional Fluid-Structure Interaction Modeling Approach.

Xiaoya Guo, Don P Giddens, David Molony, Chun Yang, Habib Samady, Jie Zheng, Gary S Mintz, Akiko Maehara, Liang Wang, Xuan Pei and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Xiaoya GuoDepartment of Mathematics, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China.
Don P GiddensDepartment of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30307.
David MolonyDepartment of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30307.
Chun YangMathematical Sciences Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609.
Habib SamadyDepartment of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30307.
Jie ZhengMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110.
Gary S MintzThe Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Columbia University, New York, NY 10022.
Akiko MaeharaThe Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Columbia University, New York, NY 10022.
Liang WangMathematical Sciences Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609.
Xuan PeiSchool of Biological Science & Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China.
Zhi-Yong LiSchool of Biological Science & Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China.
Dalin TangDepartment of Mathematics, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China.

Funding

In Vivo IVUS Image-Based Modeling for Human Coronary Plaque AssessmentR01EB004759 · NIBIB · WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE · PI TANG, DALIN, ZHENG, JIE · 2004 to 2013
$2.4M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB004759
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate cap thickness and stress/strain quantifications are of fundamental importance for vulnerable plaque research. Virtual histology intravascular ultrasound (VH-IVUS) sets cap thickness to zero when cap is under resolution limit and IVUS does not see it. An innovative modeling approach combining IVUS and optical coherence tomography (OCT) is introduced for cap thickness quantification and more accurate cap stress/strain calculations. In vivo IVUS and OCT coronary plaque data were acquired with informed consent obtained. IVUS and OCT images were merged to form the IVUS + OCT data set, with biplane angiography providing three-dimensional (3D) vessel curvature. For components where VH-IVUS set zero cap thickness (i.e., no cap), a cap was added with minimum cap thickness set as 50 and 180 μm to generate IVUS50 and IVUS180 data sets for model construction, respectively. 3D fluid-structure interaction (FSI) models based on IVUS + OCT, IVUS50, and IVUS180 data sets were constructed to investigate cap thickness impact on stress/strain calculations. Compared to IVUS + OCT, IVUS50 underestimated mean cap thickness (27 slices) by 34.5%, overestimated mean cap stress by 45.8%, (96.4 versus 66.1 kPa). IVUS50 maximum cap stress was 59.2% higher than that from IVUS + OCT model (564.2 versus 354.5 kPa). Differences between IVUS and IVUS + OCT models for cap strain and flow shear stress (FSS) were modest (cap strain <12%; FSS <6%). IVUS + OCT data and models could provide more accurate cap thickness and stress/strain calculations which will serve as basis for further plaque investigations.

Indexed as

Multimodal ImagingPatient-Specific ModelingStress, MechanicalTomography, Optical CoherenceUltrasonography, InterventionalAgedCoronary AngiographyCoronary VesselsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPlaque, AtheroscleroticPressure

Identifiers

PMID29059332
PMCPMC5816254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.