Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29059217›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Prohibition of antibiotic growth promoters has affected the genomic profiles of Lactobacillus salivarius inhabiting the swine intestine.

Jun-Yeong Lee, Geon Goo Han, Ho-Bin Lee, Sang-Mok Lee, Sang-Kee Kang, Gwi-Deuk Jin, Jongbin Park, Byung Jo Chae, Yo Han Choi, Eun Bae Kim and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. From Farm-to-Fork:Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jun-Yeong LeeDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Geon Goo HanDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ho-Bin LeeDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sang-Mok LeeDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sang-Kee KangInstitute of Green-Bio Science & Technology, Seoul National University, Pyeongchang, Republic of Korea.
Gwi-Deuk JinDepartment of Animal Life Science, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.
Jongbin ParkDepartment of Animal Life Science, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.
Byung Jo ChaeDepartment of Animal Life Science, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.
Yo Han ChoiDepartment of Animal Life Science, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.
Eun Bae KimDepartment of Animal Life Science, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.
Yun-Jaie ChoiDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seoul National University · KRKangwon National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After the introduction of a ban on the use of antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs) for livestock, the feeding environment, including the composition of animal intestinal microbiota, has changed rapidly. We hypothesized that the microbial genomes have also been affected by this legal prohibition, and investigated an important member of the swine gut microbiota, Lactobacillus salivarius, with a pan-genomic approach. Here, we isolated 21 L. salivarius strains composed of 6 strains isolated before the AGP prohibition (SBPs) and 15 strains isolated after the AGP prohibition (SAPs) at an interval of a decade, and the draft genomes were generated de novo. Several genomic differences between SBPs and SAPs were identified, although the number and function of antibiotic resistance genes were not different. SBPs showed larger genome size and a higher number of orthologs, as well as lower genetic diversity, than SAPs. SBPs had genes associated with the utilization of L-rhamnose and D-tagatose for energy production. Because these sugars are also used in exopolysaccharide (EPS) synthesis, we tried to identify differences in biofilm formation-associated genes. The genes for the production of EPSs and extracellular proteins were different in terms of amino acid sequences. Indeed, SAPs formed dense biofilm and survived better than SBPs in the swine intestinal environment. These results suggest that SAPs have evolved and adapted to protect themselves from new selection pressure of the swine intestinal microenvironment by forming dense biofilms, adopting a distinct antibiotic resistance strategy. This finding is particularly important to understand the evolutionary changes in host-microbe interaction and provide detailed insight for the development of effective probiotics for livestock.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiofilmsDrug Resistance, MicrobialGenome, BacterialIntestinesLigilactobacillus salivariusProbioticsSwine

Identifiers

PMID29059217
PMCPMC5653324
OpenAlexW2767102083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.