Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29058768›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology resources2018

The impact of endogenous content, replicates and pooling on genome capture from faecal samples.

Jessica Hernandez-Rodriguez, Mimi Arandjelovic, Jack Lester, Cesare de Filippo, Antje Weihmann, Matthias Meyer, Samuel Angedakin, Ferran Casals, Arcadi Navarro, Linda Vigilant and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Local genetic adaptation to habitat in wild chimpanzees.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The genomics of ecological flexibility, large brains, and long lives in capuchin monkeys revealed with fecalFACS.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jessica Hernandez-RodriguezDepartament de Ciencies Experimentals i de la Salut, Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (Universitat Pompeu Fabra/CSIC), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0402-286X
Mimi ArandjelovicDepartment of Primatology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Jack LesterDepartment of Primatology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Cesare de FilippoDepartment of Primatology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Antje WeihmannDepartment of Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Matthias MeyerDepartment of Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Samuel AngedakinDepartment of Primatology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Ferran CasalsGenomics Core Facility, Departament de Ciencies Experimentals i de la Salut, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Parc de Recerca Biomèdica de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Arcadi NavarroDepartament de Ciencies Experimentals i de la Salut, Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (Universitat Pompeu Fabra/CSIC), Barcelona, Spain.
Linda VigilantDepartment of Primatology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Hjalmar S KühlDepartment of Primatology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Kevin LangergraberSchool of Human Evolution & Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Christophe BoeschDepartment of Primatology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
David HughesDepartament de Ciencies Experimentals i de la Salut, Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (Universitat Pompeu Fabra/CSIC), Barcelona, Spain.
Tomas Marques-BonetDepartament de Ciencies Experimentals i de la Salut, Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (Universitat Pompeu Fabra/CSIC), Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

2/2 Somatic mosaicism and autism spectrum disorderU01MH106874 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SESTAN, NENAD · 2015 to 2019
$4.0M
NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH106874
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Target-capture approach has improved over the past years, proving to be very efficient tool for selectively sequencing genetic regions of interest. These methods have also allowed the use of noninvasive samples such as faeces (characterized by their low quantity and quality of endogenous DNA) to be used in conservation genomic, evolution and population genetic studies. Here we aim to test different protocols and strategies for exome capture using the Roche SeqCap EZ Developer kit (57.5 Mb). First, we captured a complex pool of DNA libraries. Second, we assessed the influence of using more than one faecal sample, extract and/or library from the same individual, to evaluate its effect on the molecular complexity of the experiment. We validated our experiments with 18 chimpanzee faecal samples collected from two field sites as a part of the Pan African Programme: The Cultured Chimpanzee. Those two field sites are in Kibale National Park, Uganda (N = 9) and Loango National Park, Gabon (N = 9). We demonstrate that at least 16 libraries can be pooled, target enriched through hybridization, and sequenced allowing for the genotyping of 951,949 exome markers for population genetic analyses. Further, we observe that molecule richness, and thus, data acquisition, increase when using multiple libraries from the same extract or multiple extracts from the same sample. Finally, repeated captures significantly decrease the proportion of off-target reads from 34.15% after one capture round to 7.83% after two capture rounds, supporting our conclusion that two rounds of target enrichment are advisable when using complex faecal samples.

Indexed as

AnimalsDNAFecesGabonGenetics, PopulationMetagenomicsPan troglodytesSampling StudiesUgandaDNAconservation geneticsexomenext-generation sequencingnoninvasive samplestarget enrichment

Identifiers

PMID29058768
PMCPMC5900898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.