ArticleCancer medicine2017
Prognostic role of tumor necrosis in patients undergoing curative resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a multicenter analysis of 740 cases in China.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic value of tumor necrosis in gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A meta-analysis.Medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Comparison of laparoscopic versus open approach surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors in unfavorable surgical locations.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Relationship between multi-slice computed tomography features and pathological risk stratification assessment in gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2023Article
- A CT-based nomogram for predicting the malignant potential of primary gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors preoperatively.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2021Article
- Mutational characteristics of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A single-center analysis of 302 patients.Oncology letters · 2021Article
- Prognostic Indicators for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Review.Translational oncology · 2020Review
- Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours (GIST): Indian Experience of Rare Malignancy.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2020Article
- Correlation between Three-Dimensional Volume and Malignant Potential of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs).Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Extracellular KBioelectricity · 2019Article
- The prognostic value of gastrointestinal bleeding in gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A propensity score matching analysis.Cancer medicine · 2019Article
- Clinicopathological Outcomes and Prognosis of Elderly Patients (≥ 65 Years) with Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) Undergoing Curative-Intent Resection: a Multicenter Data Review.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2019Article
- Relationship of prognostic nutritional index with prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Journal of Cancer · 2019Article
- Prognostic role of tumor necrosis in patients undergoing curative resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a multicenter analysis of 740 cases in China.Cancer medicine · 2017Article
- Impact of Prognostic Nutritional Index on Terminal Cancer Patients.Indian journal of palliative careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tumor necrosis is associated with poor clinical outcomes in many malignancies. We aimed to determine whether tumor necrosis was an independent predictor of outcomes in gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). We retrospectively analyzed data from 740 patients undergoing curative resection for gastric GIST at four centers between 2001 and 2015. Disease-free survival (DFS) was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method, and associations with prognosis were assessed with Cox regression models. Tumor necrosis was present in 122 cases (16.5%). The prevalence of tumor necrosis increased with higher risk-stratification, including 0.7%, 7.4%, 17.3%, and 39.3% for very low-, low-, intermediate- and high-risk tumors, respectively (P < 0.001). Tumor necrosis was associated with aggressive tumor biology, such as larger tumor size, higher mitotic index, tumor rupture, and presence of nuclear atypia (all P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that tumor necrosis was an independent predictor of unfavorable DFS (HR: 2.641; 95% CI: 1.359-5.131; P = 0.004). When stratified by the modified National Institutes of Health (NIH) classification, tumor necrosis still independently predicted DFS in high-risk patients (P = 0.001) but not in non-high-risk patients (P = 0.349). The 5-year DFS rate in high-risk patients with and without tumor necrosis was 56.5% and 82.9%, respectively (P = 0.004). Notably, the prognostic significance of tumor necrosis was maintained when the patients were stratified by age, sex, tumor location, tumor size, and mitotic index (All P < 0.05). Tumor necrosis is a useful predictor of outcomes in gastric GIST, especially in high-risk patients. Based on these results, we recommend that the current NIH classification should be further improved and expanded to include tumor necrosis as a valuable prognostic indicator.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.