Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29058363›Full record

ArticleThoracic cancer2018

Minimally invasive esophagectomy in the lateral-prone position: Experience of 124 cases in a single center.

Shaohua Ma, Tianshen Yan, Dandan Liu, Keyi Wang, Jingdi Wang, Jintao Song, Tong Wang, Wei He, Jie Bai, Liang Jin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Thoracic cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shaohua MaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2603-2185
Tianshen YanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Dandan LiuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Keyi WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jingdi WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jintao SongDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Tong WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Wei HeDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jie BaiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Liang JinDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMinimally invasive esophagectomy was first introduced as a new technique for esophageal cancer treatment 20 years ago. Performing this procedure in the lateral-prone position is the most appropriate method. Since May 2013, our center has performed 124 esophageal cancer operations using this procedure. Herein, we share our experience.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 124 consecutive patients who had received minimally invasive esophagectomy in the lateral-prone position from May 2013 to June 2017. The procedure, operative variables, postoperative complications, and oncology outcomes were assessed.

resultsThe surgery was successful in all 124 patients; three cases converted to an abdominal opening procedure during surgery. The mean total lymph node harvest was 19.2: 12.9 in the thoracic cavity and 6.0 in the abdominal cavity. The average total operation duration was 376 minutes and blood loss was 156 mL. No mortality occurred within 30 postoperative days. Forty-three cases of postoperative morbidity occurred in 38 patients (30.6%), including 11 anastomotic leakages (8.9%), 1 chyle leak (0.8%), 12 lateral recurrent nerve palsies (9.7%), 11 pulmonary complications (8.9%), and 8 other complications (6.5%). A learning curve indicated that blood loss, operation duration, and the number of lymph nodes harvested would improve with time.

conclusionsSurgical and oncological outcomes following minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer were acceptable. There are some advantages to this technique compared to previous reports of opening procedures.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overEsophagectomyFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedProne PositionRetrospective StudiesThoracoscopyEsophageal cancerlaparoscopicthoracoscope

Identifiers

PMID29058363
PMCPMC5754288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.