Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29058356›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2018

Predicting auditory feedback control of speech production from subregional shape of subcortical structures.

Xiaoying Tang, Na Chen, Siyun Zhang, Jeffery A Jones, Baofeng Zhang, Jingyuan Li, Peng Liu, Hanjun Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Do Not Cut Off Your Tail: A Mega-Analysis of Responses to Auditory Perturbation Experiments.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Association Between Genetic Variation inFrontiers in neuroscience · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xiaoying TangSun Yat-sen University-Carnegie Melon University (SYSU-CMU) Joint Institute of Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7894-6774
Na ChenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Siyun ZhangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Jeffery A JonesPsychology Department and Laurier Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3C5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0570-291X
Baofeng ZhangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Jingyuan LiSun Yat-sen University-Carnegie Melon University (SYSU-CMU) Joint Institute of Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Peng LiuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Hanjun LiuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1466-4193

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although a growing body of research has focused on the cortical sensorimotor mechanisms that support auditory feedback control of speech production, much less is known about the subcortical contributions to this control process. This study examined whether subregional anatomy of subcortical structures assessed by statistical shape analysis is associated with vocal compensations and cortical event-related potentials in response to pitch feedback errors. The results revealed significant negative correlations between the magnitudes of vocal compensations and subregional shape of the right thalamus, between the latencies of vocal compensations and subregional shape of the left caudate and pallidum, and between the latencies of cortical N1 responses and subregional shape of the left putamen. These associations indicate that smaller local volumes of the basal ganglia and thalamus are predictive of slower and larger neurobehavioral responses to vocal pitch errors. Furthermore, increased local volumes of the left hippocampus and right amygdala were predictive of larger vocal compensations, suggesting that there is an interplay between the memory-related subcortical structures and auditory-vocal integration. These results, for the first time, provide evidence for differential associations of subregional morphology of the basal ganglia, thalamus, hippocampus, and amygdala with neurobehavioral processing of vocal pitch errors, suggesting that subregional shape measures of subcortical structures can predict behavioral outcome of auditory-vocal integration and associated neural features. Hum Brain Mapp 39:459-471, 2018. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

BrainElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFeedback, SensoryFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePitch PerceptionSpeechSpeech PerceptionYoung Adultauditory feedbacksensorimotor integrationshape analysisspeech productionsubcortical morphology

Identifiers

PMID29058356
PMCPMC6866279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.