ArticlePediatric surgery international2018
Reconstructive surgery for recurrent penile curvature.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prenatal imaging for hypospadias: a bayesian analysis-based systematic review of diagnostic accuracy and key imaging features.Pediatric surgery international · 2025Pooled it
- Dorsal shortening vs. ventral lengthening for congenital ventral curvature in patients with/without severe hypospadias A meta-analysis of comparative studies.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2023Review
- A scoping review on chordee correction in boys with ventral congenital penile curvature and hypospadias.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of IndiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThere are surprisingly few reports about reconstructive surgery for severe recurrent/persistent penile curvature (redo-PC). We present our experience.
methodsWe reviewed 9 redo-PC cases we treated between 1998 and 2016.
resultsCases 1-3 and 5 were identified from 111 consecutive hypospadias patients we treated between 1998 and 2016 (4/111; 3.6%). Cases 4 and 6-9 had initial surgery elsewhere. Initial PC was severe (> 45°; n = 5), moderate (30°-45°; n = 1), or unknown (n = 3), treated by dorsal plication (DP) in 4/9 (cases 1-4), chordectomy in 2/9 (cases 5, 6), and unknown in 3/9 (cases 7-9); no case had tunica albuginea incision (TAI). Straightening after initial surgery was confirmed by artificial erection (AE) in 4/9, not confirmed (2/9), and unknown (3/9). Cases 1, 2, 7 and 8 had had previous failed redos. Scarring of buccal mucosa used for urethroplasty caused worse PC in cases 7 and 9. After TAI (n = 6; cases 1, 3-6, and 8) or scar removal with DP (n = 3; cases 2, 7, and 9), AE confirmed successful straightening in all cases, without sequelae after a mean follow-up of 2.6 years.
conclusionTAI was most effective for redo-PC surgery. Preoperative AE and examination under anesthesia should be used to customize treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.