ArticleScientific reports2017
Investigation of foaming causes in three mesophilic food waste digesters: reactor performance and microbial analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review in anaerobic digestion of food waste.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Changes in the growth performance, serum biochemistry, rumen fermentation, rumen microbiota community, and intestinal development in weaned goats during rumen-protected methionine treatment.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- Co-substrate composition is critical for enrichment of functional key species and for process efficiency during biogas production from cattle manure.Microbial biotechnology · 2023Article
- Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste and Its Microbial Consortia: A Historical Review and Future Perspectives.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Physico-Chemical and Metagenomic Profile Analyses of Animal Manures Routinely Used as Inocula in Anaerobic Digestion for Biogas Production.Microorganisms · 2022Article
- The role of microbial ecology in improving the performance of anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
- Engineered Nanomaterials in Soil: Their Impact on Soil Microbiome and Plant Health.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Comparison of microbial community structures between mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of vegetable waste.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2021Article
- The Role ofMicroorganisms · 2020Article
- Long-Term Mesophilic Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Swine Manure with Corn Stover and Microbial Community Analysis.Microorganisms · 2020Article
- Inoculum Source Determines Acetate and Lactate Production during Anaerobic Digestion of Sewage Sludge and Food Waste.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Substrate-Induced Response in Biogas Process Performance and Microbial Community Relates Back to Inoculum Source.Microorganisms · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Foaming negatively affects anaerobic digestion of food waste (FW). To identify the causes of foaming, reactor performance and microbial community dynamics were investigated in three mesophilic digesters treating FW. The digesters were operated under different modes, and foaming was induced with several methods. Proliferation of specific bacteria and accumulation of surface active materials may be the main causes of foaming. Volatile fatty acids (VFAs) and total ammonia nitrogen (TAN) accumulated in these reactors before foaming, which may have contributed to foam formation by decreasing the surface tension of sludge and increasing foam stability. The relative abundance of acid-producing bacteria (Petrimonas, Fastidiosipila, etc.) and ammonia producers (Proteiniphilum, Gelria, Aminobacterium, etc.) significantly increased after foaming, which explained the rapid accumulation of VFAs and NH
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.