ArticleCurrent opinion in systems biology2017
Systems biology in the central nervous system: a brief perspective on essential recent advancements.
Article in Current opinion in systems biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inorganic Nanomaterials versus Polymer-Based Nanoparticles for Overcoming Neurodegeneration.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Neuronanomedicine: An Up-to-Date Overview.Pharmaceutics · 2019Review
- Impact of Nanoparticles on Brain Health: An Up to Date Overview.Journal of clinical medicine · 2018Review
- The Dynamics of Concussion: Mapping Pathophysiology, Persistence, and Recovery With Causal-Loop Diagramming.Frontiers in neurology · 2018Article
- Toward Model Building for Visual Aesthetic Perception.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As recent advances in human genetics have begun to more rapidly identify the individual genes contributing to risk of psychiatric disease, the spotlight now turns to understanding how disruption of these genes alters the brain, and thus behavior. Compared to other tissues, cellular complexity in the brain provides both a substantial challenge and a significant opportunity for systems biology approaches. Current methods are maturing that will allow for finally defining the 'parts list' for the functioning mouse and human brains, enabling new approaches to defining how the system goes awry in disorders of the CNS. However, the availability of tissue is certainly a challenge for systems biology of neuroscience, compared to systems biology of other tissues, where biopsy is feasible. This challenge is particularly notable for disorders caused by extremely rare genetic variants. Thus computational and systems biology approaches, as well as precise experimental models by way of genome editing, will play key roles in defining mechanisms for disorders, and their individual symptoms, across varied genetic etiologies. Here, we highlight recent progress in neurogenetics, postmortem genomics, cell-type specific profiling, and precision modeling toward defining mechanisms in disease.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.