Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29057355›Full record

ReviewJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2017

Systematic review of 3D printing in spinal surgery: the current state of play.

Ben Wilcox, Ralph J Mobbs, Ai-Min Wu, Kevin Phan

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03786432 (A Prospective Clinical Pilot Study Of Fusion Rates Using Spira™-C Titanium 3-D Printed Interbody Device For Anterior Cervical Discectomy And Fusion), which is not on this map. Cited by 81 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03786432 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective Clinical Pilot Study Of Fusion Rates Using Spira™-C Titanium 3-D Printed Interbody Device For Anterior Cervical Discectomy And Fusion

TypeinterventionalSponsorCorewell Health EastRan2019 to 2022Enrolled13ConditionsCervical Radiculopathy, Cervical Disc DiseaseArmsSpira-C Interbody Device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 201 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical applications of 3D printing in spine surgery: a systematic review.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. 3D-printed drill guide template, a promising tool to improve pedicle screw placement accuracy in spinal deformity surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. 3D-printed navigation template in cervical spine fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. 3D-printed spine surgery implants: a systematic review of the efficacy and clinical safety profile of patient-specific and off-the-shelf devices.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Three-Dimensional Printing in Pediatric Orthopaedics: Cost Analysis and Emerging Applications.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ben WilcoxNeuroSpine Surgery Research Group, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Ralph J MobbsNeuroSpine Surgery Research Group, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Ai-Min WuDepartment of Spine Surgery, Orthopaedic Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of the Wenzhou Medical University, The Second Medical School of the Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang Spine Center, Wenzhou 325027, China.
Kevin PhanNeuroSpine Surgery Research Group, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Prince of Wales Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-dimensional printing (3DP), also known as "Additive Manufacturing", is a rapidly growing industry, particularly in the area of spinal surgery. Given the complex anatomy of the spine and delicate nature of surrounding structures, 3DP has the potential to aid surgical planning and procedural accuracy. We perform a systematic review of current literature on the applications of 3DP in spinal surgery. Six electronic databases were searched for original published studies reporting cases or outcomes for 3DP surgical models, guides or implants for spinal surgery. The findings of these studies were synthesized and summarized. These searches returned a combined 2,411 articles. Of these, 54 were included in this review. 3DP is currently used for surgical planning, intra-operative surgical guides, customised prostheses as well as "Off-the-Shelf" implants. The technology has the potential for enhanced implant properties, as well as decreased surgical time and better patient outcomes. The majority of the data thus far is from low-quality studies with inherent biases linked with the excitement of a new field. As the body of literature continues to expand, larger scale studies to evaluate advantages and disadvantages, and longer-term follow up will enhance our knowledge of the effect 3DP has in spinal surgery. In addition, issues such as financial impact, time to design and print, materials selection and bio-printing will evolve as this rapidly expanding field matures.

Indexed as

3Dadditive manufacturinglumbaroff-the-shelfpatient-specific implantspinal surgeryspineThree-dimensional printing

Identifiers

PMID29057355
PMCPMC5637198
OpenAlexW2759156034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.