Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29057277›Full record

ArticleJournal of biological methods2017

A method for evaluating cocaine-induced social preference in rats.

P M Dingess, M J Deters, R A Darling, E A Yarborough, T E Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biological methods, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

P M DingessUniversity of Wyoming, Neuroscience Program, Laramie, WY 82071, USA.
M J DetersUniversity of Wyoming, Neuroscience Program, Laramie, WY 82071, USA.
R A DarlingUniversity of Wyoming, Neuroscience Program, Laramie, WY 82071, USA.
E A YarboroughUniversity of Wyoming, School of Pharmacy, Laramie, WY 82071, USA.
T E BrownUniversity of Wyoming, Neuroscience Program, Laramie, WY 82071, USA.

Funding

NEUROSCIENCE CORE CENTERP30GM103398 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING · PI FLYNN, FRANCIS W · 2012 to 2015
$3.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM103398
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug addicts are extremely sensitive to cues that predict drug availability and exposure to these cues can facilitate drug relapse. Cues vary in their nature but can include drug-associated paraphernalia, environmental contexts, and discrete conditioned stimuli (e.g., advertisements). One cue that has recently been heavily investigated is that of social interaction. To date, it has been demonstrated that when cocaine is conditioned with social interaction, place preference for cocaine significantly increases, suggesting that the presence of social interaction during a drug-associated "high" enhances the magnitude of drug reward. When social interaction is provided in a mutually exclusive, non-drug environment though, it can serve as a preventative stimulus towards cocaine seeking. What remains unknown is whether contact with rats associated with drug experience facilitates preferential social interactions for those rats. The first step in answering this question is to determine if rats can behaviorally discriminate between drug-associated and non-drug-associated conspecifics, much like humans can differentiate their "drug-friends" from their non-drug-using friends. Using a custom social interaction chamber, in which rats were able to interact with two distinct conspecifics via holes in a boundary wall, we demonstrate that rats exhibit more interactive and investigative behavior towards a partner that was consistently present during the drug-state, than a partner that was present when the rat was "sober". It is our hope that this protocol will contribute to the development of models designed to study social cue-induced reinstatement, and related neural substrates, and will ultimately contribute to the treatment of substance use disorders.

Indexed as

cocaineconditioned preferencesocial cues

Identifiers

PMID29057277
PMCPMC5647838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.