Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29057266›Full record

Trial reportBioMed research international2017

Tapered, Double-Lead Threads Single Implants Placed in Fresh Extraction Sockets and Healed Sites of the Posterior Jaws: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial with 1 to 3 Years of Follow-Up.

Alessandro Cucchi, Elisabetta Vignudelli, Simonetta Franco, Luca Levrini, Dario Castellani, Luca Pagliani, Massimiliano Rea, Claudio Modena, Giulio Sandri, Carlo Longhi

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BioMed research international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. [Immediate implantation following tooth extraction in fresh maxillary molar socket with poor bone quality].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alessandro CucchiDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5155-2807
Elisabetta VignudelliDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Simonetta FrancoDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4411-9930
Luca LevriniDepartment of Surgical and Morphological Science, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2412-7765
Dario CastellaniPrivate Practice, 50129 Firenze, Italy.
Luca PaglianiPrivate Practice, 20122 Milano, Italy.
Massimiliano ReaPrivate Practice, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.
Claudio ModenaDepartment of Diagnostic and Surgical Science, University of Genoa, 16126 Genoa, Italy.
Giulio SandriPrivate Practice, 37126 Verona, Italy.
Carlo LonghiPrivate Practice, 46035 Mantova, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the survival, success, and complication rates of tapered double-lead threads single implants, placed in fresh extraction sockets and healed sites of the posterior jaws.

methodsThe enrolled patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: in the test group (TG), all implants were inserted at the time of tooth extraction; in the control group (CG), all implants were placed 3 months after extraction. The implants were followed for a period of 1 to 3 years after loading. The main outcomes were implant survival, complications, and implant-crown success.

resultsNinety-two patients had 97 installed implants (49 in the TG, 48 in the CG). Only two implants failed, in the TG; the survival rates were therefore 95.9% (47/49) and 100% (48/48) for TG and CG, respectively. In the surviving implants, no complications were reported, for an implant-crown success of 100%.

conclusionsAlthough a significant difference was found in the levels of primary stability between TG and CG, single implants placed in fresh extraction sockets and healed sites of the posterior jaws had similar survival and complication rates. Crestal bone levels and peri-implant bone resorption showed similar values. A longer follow-up period is however required, to confirm these positive outcomes.

Indexed as

Dental Implants, Single-ToothOrthognathic Surgical ProceduresTooth ExtractionAdultAgedAlveolar Bone LossDental Prosthesis DesignDental Restoration FailureFemaleHumansJawMaleMaxillaMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID29057266
PMCPMC5615954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.