Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29057183›Full record

ArticleCureus2017

A Low-Cost, Low-Skill Model for Efficient Breast Cancer Screening in Low Resource Rural Settings of a Developing Country.

Sachin Khanduri, Mriganki Chaudhary, Tushar Sabharwal, Tarim Usmani, Aakshit Goyal, Shobha Khanduri, Saurav Bhagat, Fahimul Huda, Santosh Yadav, Gaurav Katyal

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sachin KhanduriRadiodiagnosis, Era's Lucknow Medical College and Hospital.
Mriganki ChaudharyRadiodiagnosis, Era's Lucknow Medical College and Hospital.
Tushar SabharwalRadiodiagnosis, Era's Lucknow Medical College and Hospital.
Tarim UsmaniRadiodiagnosis, Era's Lucknow Medical College and Hospital.
Aakshit GoyalRadiodiagnosis, Era's Lucknow Medical College and Hospital.
Shobha KhanduriPathology, Era's Lucknow Medical College and Hospital.
Saurav BhagatRadiodiagnosis, Era's Lucknow Medical College and Hospital.
Fahimul HudaRadiodiagnosis, Era's Lucknow Medical College and Hospital.
Santosh YadavRadiodiagnosis, Era's Lucknow Medical College and Hospital.
Gaurav KatyalRadiodiagnosis, Era's Lucknow Medical College and Hospital.
Era's Lucknow Medical College and Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective To suggest a low-cost, easily-operable, non-invasive imaging modality for cancer detection in rural settings. Method A total of 212 cases with palpable breast masses aged 18 - 65 years were enrolled and underwent thorough clinical, mammographic, and ultrasonographic (USG) evaluation. Imaging findings were reported using the American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS®) criteria. The findings were confirmed histopathologically. Data were analyzed using the Chi-square test. Results The malignancy rate was 35.8% (n = 76). On mammography, lesions size, margins, shape, calcification, and distorted arch/skin thickening were significantly associated with malignancy. On USG, the number of nodules, shape, margins, echotexture, posterior wall echo, through transmission changes, distorted arch/skin thickening, microlobulation, duct extension, and height/width ratio were significantly associated with malignancy. Independently, mammography and USG had a sensitivity of 78.1% and 80.3%, respectively, and a specificity of 83.3% and 89.0%, respectively. Using a positive result of either study as the criteria, the sensitivity was 97.4% and the specificity was 80.1%. Conclusion The combined use of mammography and USG provides high sensitivity and specificity, thus showing that a combination of two can be used as a screening tool for use in low resource rural settings.

Indexed as

breast cancerlow resource rural settingsmammographyusg

Identifiers

PMID29057183
PMCPMC5642813
OpenAlexW2749004960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.