Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29057086›Full record

ArticleJournal of virus eradication2017

InterPrEP. Internet-based pre-exposure prophylaxis with generic tenofovir DF/emtricitabine in London: an analysis of outcomes in 641 patients.

Isaac Aloysius, Anna Savage, Jey Zdravkov, Roxanna Korologou-Linden, Andrew Hill, Rachel Smith, Vicky Houghton-Price, Marta Boffito, Nneka Nwokolo

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virus eradication, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Isaac Aloysius56 Dean Street, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK.
Anna SavageSchool of Medicine, Cardiff University, UK.
Jey Zdravkov56 Dean Street, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK.
Roxanna Korologou-LindenFaculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK.
Andrew HillDepartment of Translational Medicine, Liverpool University, UK.
Rachel SmithMetaVirology Ltd, London, UK.
Vicky Houghton-PriceMetaVirology Ltd, London, UK.
Marta Boffito
Nneka Nwokolo56 Dean Street, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is not available on the National Health Service (NHS) in England. People are buying generic versions of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)/emtricitabine (FTC) on the internet, which is legal under UK import laws.

methodsHIV-negative individuals attending our clinic who reported purchasing generic PrEP online were provided with risk-reduction advice and were evaluated for HIV, hepatitis B and C, renal function and sexually transmitted infections (STIs)on their first visit. They were offered regular follow-up visits every 3 months and given risk-reduction advice. Plasma therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for tenofovir and FTC was also offered.

results641 individuals accessed the service during 2016-2017. Median time on generic PrEP was 202 days. All were MSM, 81% were white, 75% used PrEP daily and 14% on an event-driven basis, and 67% were on generic TDF/FTC manufactured by Cipla Ltd. There were no serious adverse events. Thirty-nine percent of individuals (191/494) reported using recreational drugs in the 12 months before starting PrEP, and 29% (127/443) reported this while taking PrEP. During follow-up, 26% (142/552) of individuals were diagnosed with an STI at one or more follow-up visits. In 336 person-years of follow-up, there were no cases of HIV infection (0%, 95% CI 0%-1.1%). There were no new cases of hepatitis B and two new cases of hepatitis C. DISCUSSION: There were no new cases of HIV in 641 individuals using generic PrEP. At the same centre, new HIV diagnoses fell from 69 per month in October 2015 to 15 per month in June 2017. We believe that our support for individuals taking generic PrEP has contributed to this fall. There was a 10% increase in STI diagnoses during PrEP compared to baseline. Strategies to reduce STIs remain crucial.

Indexed as

HIV infection, pre-exposure prophylaxis, generic, antiretroviral drugs

Identifiers

PMID29057086
PMCPMC5632549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.