ReviewScience and technology of advanced materials2017
Hierarchical nanoporous metals as a path toward the ultimate three-dimensional functionality.
Review in Science and technology of advanced materials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering MXene/metal composites from MAX phase/metal-Al precursors for high-performance energy conversion and storage.RSC advances · 2025Article
- Nanoporous Copper Films via Dynamic Hydrogen Bubbling: A Promising SERS Substrate for Sensitive Detection of Methylene Blue.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Nanoporous Gold: From Structure Evolution to Functional Properties in Catalysis and Electrochemistry.Chemical reviews · 2023Review
- Facile fabrication of hierarchically nanostructured gold electrode for bio-electrochemical applications.Journal of electroanalytical chemistry (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Nanoporous ultra-high-entropy alloys containing fourteen elements for water splitting electrocatalysis.Chemical science · 2021Article
- Nanoporous Metals: From Plasmonic Properties to Applications in Enhanced Spectroscopy and Photocatalysis.ACS nano · 2021Article
- NiCoNano-micro letters · 2020Review
- A Dewetted-Dealloyed Nanoporous Pt Co-Catalyst Formed on TiOChemistry, an Asian journal · 2020Article
- Fabrication of Porous Gold Film Using Graphene Oxide as a Sacrificial Layer.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Article
- Multi-Scale Modeling for Predicting the Stiffness and Strength of Hollow-Structured Metal Foams with Structural Hierarchy.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanoporous metals prepared via dealloying or selective leaching of solid solution alloys and compounds represent an emerging class of materials. They possess a three-dimensional (3D) structure of randomly interpenetrating ligaments/nanopores with sizes between 5 nm and several tens of micrometers, which can be tuned by varying their preparation conditions (such as dealloying time and temperature) or additional thermal coarsening. As compared to other nanostructured materials, nanoporous metals have many advantages, including their bicontinuous structure, tunable pore sizes, bulk form, good electrical conductivity, and high structural stability. Therefore, nanoporous metals represent ideal 3D materials with versatile functionality, which can be utilized in various fields. In this review, we describe the recent applications of nanoporous metals in molecular detection, catalysis, 3D graphene synthesis, hierarchical pore formation, and additive manufacturing (3D printing) together with our own achievements in these areas. Finally, we discuss possible ways of realizing the ultimate 3D functionality beyond the scope of nanoporous metals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.