Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29056871›Full record

ArticleJournal of technology in human services2016

Using Technology to Facilitate Collaboration in Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR).

Lauren Jessell, Vivian Smith, Alexis Jemal, Liliane Windsor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of technology in human services, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lauren JessellSilver School of Social Work, New York University, New York, New York.
Vivian SmithCabrini College, Radnor, Pennsylvania.
Alexis JemalNational Development and Research Institutes Inc., New York, New York.
Liliane WindsorSchool of Social Work, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois.

Funding

BEHAVIORAL SCI TRAINING IN DRUG ABUSE RESEARCHT32DA007233 · NIDA · PUBLIC HEALTH SOLUTIONS · PI GOLDSAMT, LLOYD A · 1985 to 2023
$20.2M
RESEARCH METHODS COREP30MH079920 · NIMH · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI WOLFF, NANCY · 2008 to 2012
$7.7M
NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007233NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH079920
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study explores the use of Computer-Supported Collaborative Work (CSCW) technologies, by way of a computer-based system called iCohere. This system was used to facilitate collaboration conducting Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR). Data was gathered from 13 members of a Community Collaborative Board (CCB). Analysis revealed that iCohere served the following functions: facilitating communication, providing a depository for information and resource sharing, and allowing for remote meeting attendance. Results indicated that while iCohere was useful in performing these functions, less expensive technologies had the potential to achieve similar goals if properly implemented. Implications for future research on CSCW systems and CBPR are discussed.

Indexed as

Community based participatory researchcomputer supported collaborative workimpact of technologyinformation & communication technology

Identifiers

PMID29056871
PMCPMC5646695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.