ArticleNarrative inquiry in bioethics2017
Fertility Lost-Fertility Found: Narratives from the Leading Edge of Oncofertility.
Article in Narrative inquiry in bioethics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Disparities in Female Pediatric, Adolescent and Young Adult Oncofertility: A Needs Assessment.Cancers · 2021Review
- Oncofertility-An emerging discipline rather than a special consideration.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2018Review
- The mutual benefits of research in wild animal species and human-assisted reproduction.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A cancer diagnosis at a young age creates one of the most existential crises one can imagine. The good news is that for many of these young patients, they will survive their diagnosis. They will be told of the side effects of treatment including loss of hair but will not be told of the other losses associated with their reproductive function-loss of menstrual cycles, early menopause and the potential for pregnancy for women, loss of viable sperm for men, and loss of sexual libido in both cases. Not all cancer treatments result in the same series of fertility effects so one of the issues that physicians face is determining what the best course of fertility sparing options should be. That dilemma is in the best cases-in many more cases the patients are not told about the potential loss of fertility and are left with a myriad of financial and psychological decisions and costs that they navigate on their own. The stories in this symposium capture this unfolding series of events. Some cases result in good prognosis and fertility options that are appropriate and the patients are happy with the outcome. Others express regret and loss of potential now beyond their reach. As a practitioner in the field I find these narratives reinforce how important the broad research field of oncofertility is. These patients are at the forefront of emerging technologies and emerging medical interactions between disciplines that were miles away from each other. The stories illuminate the individual and the universal and are critical to the overall context of this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.