Pollution, health, and the planet: time for decisive action.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. A national survey of ambient air pollution health literacy among adult residents of Taiwan.BMC public health · 2021
   Article
2. Do Authentic People Care about the Environment? A View from Two Paradigms.Psychology in Russia : state of the art · 2021
   Article
3. Factors determining the diffusion of COVID-19 and suggested strategy to prevent future accelerated viral infectivity similar to COVID.The Science of the total environment · 2020
   Article
4. Coordinating health promotion in a federal state over the course of 30 years: a case report from Switzerland.Health promotion perspectives · 2019
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  The Lancet Commission on pollution and health.2018
• Erratum issued
  Department of Error.2018

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as