Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29056066›Full record

ReviewMolecular pain

Monoclonal antibodies for chronic pain: a practical review of mechanisms and clinical applications.

Ju-Fen Yeh, Aysen Akinci, Mohammed Al Shaker, Ming Hong Chang, Andrei Danilov, Rocio Guileen, Kirk Johnson, Yong-Chul Kim, Ahmed El-Shafei, Vladimir Skljarevski and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular pain. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Monoclonal Antibodies for Chronic Pain Treatment: Present and Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  9. Chronic Prostatitis and Pelvic Pain Syndrome: Another Autoimmune Disease?Archivum immunologiae et therapiae experimentalis · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

Ju-Fen Yeh
Aysen AkinciHacettepe Universitesi Tip Fakultesi.
Mohammed Al ShakerKing Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre.
Ming Hong ChangTaichung Veterans General Hospital.
Andrei Danilov
Rocio GuileenNational Cancer Institute, México DF.
Kirk JohnsonEli Lilly and Company.
Yong-Chul KimSeoul National University School of Medicine.
Ahmed El-ShafeiEli Lilly (Suisse) S.A.
Vladimir SkljarevskiEli Lilly and Company.
Hector DuenasEli Lilly y Compañía de México.
Warat TassanawipasPhramongkutklao Army Hospital.
Eli Lilly (United States) · USHacettepe University · TRKing Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre · SAPhramongkutklao Hospital · THSechenov University · RUSeoul National University Hospital · KRTaichung Veterans General Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Context: Monoclonal antibodies are being investigated for chronic pain to overcome the shortcomings of current treatment options. Objective: To provide a practical overview of monoclonal antibodies in clinical development for use in chronic pain conditions, with a focus on mechanisms of action and relevance to specific classes. Methods: Qualitative review using a systematic strategy to search for randomized controlled trials, systematic and nonsystematic (narrative) reviews, observational studies, nonclinical studies, and case reports for inclusion. Studies were identified via relevant search terms using an electronic search of MEDLINE via PubMed (1990 to June 2017) in addition to hand-searching reference lists of retrieved systematic and nonsystematic reviews. Results: Monoclonal antibodies targeting nerve growth factor, calcitonin gene-related peptide pathways, various ion channels, tumor necrosis factor-α, and epidermal growth factor receptor are in different stages of development. Mechanisms of action are dependent on specific signaling pathways, which commonly involve those related to peripheral neurogenic inflammation. In clinical studies, there has been a mixed response to different monoclonal antibodies in several chronic pain conditions, including migraine, neuropathic pain conditions (e.g., diabetic peripheral neuropathy), osteoarthritis, chronic back pain, ankylosing spondylitis, and cancer. Adverse events observed to date have generally been mild, although further studies are needed to ensure safety of monoclonal antibodies in early stages of development, especially where there is an overlap with non-pain-related pathways. High acquisition cost remains another treatment limitation. Conclusion: Monoclonal antibodies for chronic pain have the potential to overcome the limitations of current treatment options, but strategies to ensure their appropriate use need to be determined.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalCentral Nervous System SensitizationChronic PainDiabetic NeuropathiesHumansNeuralgiaTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal

Identifiers

PMID29056066
PMCPMC5680940
OpenAlexW2766131383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.