Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29055611›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American College of Radiology : JACR2018

Mobile Versus Fixed Facility: Latinas' Attitudes and Preferences for Obtaining a Mammogram.

John R Scheel, Allison A Tillack, Lauren Mercer, Gloria D Coronado, Shirley A A Beresford, Yamile Molina, Beti Thompson

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Mobile Cancer Screening Programs: A Systematic Review of Implementation Challenges and Population Access.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cancer Prevention in Low-Resource Countries: An Overview of the Opportunity.American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

John R ScheelDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington. Electronic address: jrs4yg@uw.edu.
Allison A TillackDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Lauren MercerNew Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico.
Gloria D CoronadoKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon.
Shirley A A BeresfordSchool of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Yamile MolinaCommunity Health Sciences Division, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Beti ThompsonFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.

Funding

Understanding and preventing breast cancer disparties in LatinasP50CA148143 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI CORONADO, GLORIA D · 2010 to 2016
$9.7M
Biobehavioral Cancer Prevention and Control Training ProgramR25CA092408 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI PATRICK, DONALD LEE · 2001 to 2015
$7.1M
Empowering Latinas to Obtain Breast Cancer ScreeningsK01CA193918 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI MOLINA, YAMILE · 2016 to 2020
$729k
NCI NIH HHS K01 CA193918NCI NIH HHS P50 CA148143NCI NIH HHS R25 CA092408
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMobile mammographic services have been proposed as a way to reduce Latinas' disproportionate late-stage presentation compared with white women by increasing their access to mammography. The aims of this study were to assess why Latinas may not use mobile mammographic services and to explore their preferences after using these services.

methodsUsing a mixed-methods approach, a secondary analysis was conducted of baseline survey data (n = 538) from a randomized controlled trial to improve screening mammography rates among Latinas in Washington. Descriptive statistics and bivariate regression were used to characterize mammography location preferences and to test for associations with sociodemographic indices, health care access, and perceived breast cancer risk and beliefs. On the basis of these findings, a qualitative study (n = 18) was used to explore changes in perceptions after using mobile mammographic services.

resultsMore Latinas preferred obtaining a mammogram at a fixed facility (52.3% [n = 276]) compared with having no preference (46.3% [n = 249]) and preferring mobile mammographic services (1.7% [n = 9]). Concerns about privacy and comfort (15.6% [n = 84]) and about general quality (10.6% [n = 57]) were common reasons for preferring a fixed facility. Those with no history of mammography preferred a fixed facility (P < .05). In the qualitative study, Latinas expressed similar initial concerns but became positive toward the mobile mammographic services after obtaining a mammogram.

conclusionsAlthough most Latinas preferred obtaining a mammogram at a fixed facility, positive experiences with mobile mammography services changed their attitudes toward them. These findings highlight the need to include community education when using mobile mammographic service to increase screening mammography rates in underserved communities.

Indexed as

Patient PreferenceAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansMammographyMiddle AgedMobile Health UnitsWashingtonLatinasmammovanMobile mammographyscreeningunderserved

Identifiers

PMID29055611
PMCPMC5756515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.