Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29054913›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurointerventional surgery2018

Treatment of recurrent aneurysms using the Woven EndoBridge (WEB): anatomical and clinical results.

Matthias Gawlitza, Sebastien Soize, Anne-Christine Januel, Cristian Mihalea, Georgios-Emmanouil Metaxas, Christophe Cognard, Laurent Pierot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurointerventional surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Long-term outcomes of the Woven EndoBridge device for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. The RISE trial: A Randomized Trial on Intra-Saccular Endobridge devices.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2020
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Comparison of transradial and transfemoral access for the Woven EndoBridge embolization of intracranial aneurysms: A single-center experience.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) for recurrent aneurysms: Clinical and imaging results.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Matthias GawlitzaService de Neuroradiologie, Hôpital Maison Blanche, CHU de Reims, Reims, France.
Sebastien SoizeService de Neuroradiologie, Hôpital Maison Blanche, CHU de Reims, Reims, France.
Anne-Christine JanuelService de Neuroradiologie Diagnostique et Thérapeutique, Hôpital Purpan, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Cristian MihaleaService de Neuroradiologie Interventionnelle, NEURI, Hôpital Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Georgios-Emmanouil MetaxasService de Neuroradiologie, Hôpital Maison Blanche, CHU de Reims, Reims, France.
Christophe CognardService de Neuroradiologie Diagnostique et Thérapeutique, Hôpital Purpan, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Laurent PierotService de Neuroradiologie, Hôpital Maison Blanche, CHU de Reims, Reims, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe safety and efficacy of the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) for the treatment of naïve intracranial aneurysms has been confirmed. PURPOSE: To analyze the safety and efficacy of the WEB in the treatment of recurrent aneurysms.

methodsAnatomical and clinical results in consecutive patients with a recurrent aneurysm, who were treated using the WEB device in two French neurointerventional centers, were evaluated.

resultsSeventeen patients with 17 aneurysms were included. Treatment was feasible in 16 patients. In seven patients (41.2%), ancillary devices were used. Permanent morbidity due to a thromboembolic complication occurred in one patient (5.9%). There was no mortality. Follow-up angiographic studies were available for 15 patients after a mean of 12.1±6.1 months. Rates of complete occlusion, neck remnant, and aneurysm remnant were 33.3%, 40.0%, and 26.7%, respectively.

conclusionsTreatment of recurrent aneurysms using the WEB device may be reasonably safe and effective.

Indexed as

Surgical MeshAdultAgedEmbolization, TherapeuticEndovascular ProceduresFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntracranial AneurysmMaleMiddle AgedNeurosurgical ProceduresThromboembolismTreatment Outcomeaneurysmdeviceinterventionmaterialtechnique

Identifiers

PMID29054913
PMCPMC6031282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.