Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29054883›Full record

ArticleCMAJ open2017

The role of patient and physician advocacy in reducing wait times for cancer care: a qualitative analysis.

Maria Mathews, Donna Bulman, Dana Ryan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cancer-related care for rural and remote populations in Canada: A scoping review.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maria MathewsAffiliations: Division of Community Health and Humanities (Mathews, Ryan), Faculty of Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, Memorial University, St. John's, NL; Faculty of Nursing (Bulman), University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB.
Donna BulmanAffiliations: Division of Community Health and Humanities (Mathews, Ryan), Faculty of Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, Memorial University, St. John's, NL; Faculty of Nursing (Bulman), University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB.
Dana RyanAffiliations: Division of Community Health and Humanities (Mathews, Ryan), Faculty of Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, Memorial University, St. John's, NL; Faculty of Nursing (Bulman), University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is growing interest in the role of physician as health advocate; however, few studies have documented advocacy from the patient's perspective. To address this gap, we examined the experiences of patients with cancer from the onset of symptoms to the start of treatment in Newfoundland and Labrador and aimed to describe wait times and efforts to improve timeliness of care from the patients' perspective.

methodsWe conducted qualitative interviews with 60 participants aged 19 years or more with breast, colorectal, lung or prostate cancer who were recruited from a survey of patients with cancer that was carried out as an earlier part of a larger study. All survey participants had received care at regional cancer clinics in Newfoundland and Labrador and were selected by means of purposive sampling based on their type of cancer, level of satisfaction with care and place of residence (urban, semiurban or rural). Interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded by means of a thematic approach.

resultsParticipants described actions taken by themselves, their families/friends or members of their health care team to reduce their wait for a diagnosis and/or treatment. In all instances, participants believed that these actions resulted in more timely care. Participants reported that "insider knowledge" of health care professionals (whether friends, family members or members of the care team) was particularly valuable in reducing delays.

interpretationThe use of advocacy was relatively commonplace. The role of advocacy, whether it originates from patient or caregiver, is important to ensure access to timely, good-quality cancer care.

Identifiers

PMID29054883
PMCPMC5741425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.