Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29054880›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2017

Common Synaptic Input to Motor Neurons and Neural Drive to Targeted Reinnervated Muscles.

Dario Farina, Anna Margherita Castronovo, Ivan Vujaklija, Agnes Sturma, Stefan Salminger, Christian Hofer, Oskar Aszmann

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Experimental nerve transfer model in the neonatal rat.Neural regeneration research · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dario FarinaDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ London, United Kingdom, d.farina@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7883-2697
Anna Margherita CastronovoDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ London, United Kingdom.
Ivan VujaklijaDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ London, United Kingdom.
Agnes SturmaChristian Doppler Laboratory for Restoration of Extremity Function, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Stefan SalmingerChristian Doppler Laboratory for Restoration of Extremity Function, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Christian HoferOtto Bock Healthcare Products GmbH, 1110 Vienna, Austria.
Oskar AszmannChristian Doppler Laboratory for Restoration of Extremity Function, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Imperial College London · GBMedical University of Vienna · ATOttobock (Austria) · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We compared the behavior of motor neurons innervating their physiological muscle targets with motor neurons from the same spinal segment whose axons were surgically redirected to remnant muscles (targeted muscle reinnervation). The objective was to assess whether motor neurons with nonphysiological innervation receive similar synaptic input and could be voluntary controlled as motor neurons with natural innervation. For this purpose, we acquired high-density EMG signals from the biceps brachii in 5 male transhumeral amputees who underwent targeted reinnervation of this muscle by the ulnar nerve and from the first dorsal interosseous muscle of 5 healthy individuals to investigate the natural innervation of the ulnar nerve. The same recordings were also performed from the biceps brachii muscle of additional 5 able-bodied individuals. The EMG signals were decomposed into discharges of motor unit action potentials. Motor neurons were progressively recruited for the full range of submaximal muscle activation in all conditions. Moreover, their discharge rate significantly increased from recruitment to target activation level in a similar way across the subject groups. Motor neurons across all subject groups received common synaptic input as identified by coherence analysis of their spike trains. However, the relative strength of common input in both the delta (0.5-5 Hz) and alpha (5-13 Hz) bands was significantly smaller for the surgically reinnervated motor neuron pool with respect to the corresponding physiologically innervated one. The results support the novel approach of motor neuron interfacing for prosthesis control and provide new insights into the role of afferent input on motor neuron activity.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAdultAmputation StumpsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotor NeuronsMuscle, SkeletalNerve RegenerationNeurofeedbackRadial NerveSynapsescommon synaptic inputman-machine interfacemotor neuronprosthesestargeted muscle reinnervation

Identifiers

PMID29054880
PMCPMC6596811
OpenAlexW2766119666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.