Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29054570›Full record

ArticleActa tropica2018

Estimated seroprevalence of Anaplasma spp. and spotted fever group Rickettsia exposure among herders and livestock in Mongolia.

Michael E von Fricken, Sukhbaatar Lkhagvatseren, Bazartseren Boldbaatar, Pagbajab Nymadawa, Thomas A Weppelmann, Bekh-Ochir Baigalmaa, Benjamin D Anderson, Megan E Reller, Paul M Lantos, Gregory C Gray

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta tropica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Emergence of NovelAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  4. Molecular Detection ofVeterinary sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Metagenomic profiles ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Molecular Characteristics ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  13. Seroprevalence of Antibodies AgainstJournal of veterinary research · 2020
    Article
  14. Vector-borne bacteria in blood of camels in Iran: New data and literature review.Comparative immunology, microbiology and infectious diseases · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael E von FrickenDepartment of Global and Community Health, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA; Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: mvonfric@gmu.edu.
Sukhbaatar LkhagvatserenInstitute of Veterinary Medicine, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. Electronic address: lkhagvad@ymail.com.
Bazartseren BoldbaatarInstitute of Veterinary Medicine, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. Electronic address: boldoomglvet@yahoo.com.
Pagbajab NymadawaMongolian Academy of Medical Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. Electronic address: nymadawa@gmail.com.
Thomas A WeppelmannHerbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA. Electronic address: twepp002@fiu.edu.
Bekh-Ochir BaigalmaaNational Center for Zoonotic Diseases, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. Electronic address: bgal_h@yahoo.com.
Benjamin D AndersonDivision of Infectious Diseases, Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: Benjamin.anderson2@duke.edu.
Megan E RellerDivision of Infectious Diseases, Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: megan.reller@duke.edu.
Paul M LantosDivisions of Pediatric Infectious Diseases and General Internal Medicine, and Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: paul.lantos@duke.edu.
Gregory C GrayDivision of Infectious Diseases, Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: Gregory.gray@duke.edu.
Duke Institute for Health Innovation · USFlorida International University · USGeorge Mason University · USMongolian Academy of Sciences · MNNational Center for Communicable Diseases · MN

Funding

Duke CTSA (Composite)KL2TR001115 · NCATS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BOULWARE, LEIGH E, KRAFT, MONICA · 2013 to 2017
$5.1M
One Health Innovation Fellowships for Zoonotic Disease Research In MongoliaD43TW009373 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI GRAY, GREGORY CHARLES · 2013 to 2017
$1.6M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009373NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo better understand the epidemiology of tick-borne disease in Mongolia, a comprehensive seroprevalence study was conducted investigating exposure to Anaplasma spp. and spotted fever group (SFG) Rickettsia spp. in nomadic herders and their livestock across three provinces from 2014 to 2015.

methodsBlood was collected from 397 herders and 2370 livestock, including sheep, goats, cattle, horses and camels. Antibodies against Anaplasma spp. and SFG Rickettsia were determined by indirect immunofluorescence using commercially available slides coated with Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Rickettsia rickettsii antigens. Logistic regression was used to determine if the odds of previous exposure differed by gender, location, and species, with or without adjustment for age. To examine the association between seroprevalence and environmental variables we used ArcGIS to circumscribe the five major clusters where human and animal data were collected.

resultsAnaplasma spp. exposure was detected in 37.3% (136/365) of humans and 47.3% (1120/2370) of livestock; SFG Rickettsia exposure was detected in 19.5% (73/374) humans and 20.4% (478/2342) livestock. Compared to the southern province (aimag) of Dornogovi, located in the Gobi Desert, humans were significantly more likely to be exposed to Anaplasma spp. and SFG Rickettsia in the northern provinces of Tov (OR=7.3, 95% CI: 3.5, 15.1; OR=3.3, 95% CI: 1.7, 7.5), and Selenge (OR=6.9, 95% CI: 3.4, 14.0; OR=2.2, 95% CI: 1.1, 4.8).

conclusionThe high seroprevalence of Anaplasma spp. and SFG Rickettsia in humans and livestock suggests that exposure to tick-borne pathogens may be common in herders and livestock in Mongolia, particularly in the more northern regions of the country. Until more is known about these pathogens in Mongolia, physicians and veterinarians in the countryside should consider testing for Anaplasma and SFG Rickettsia infections and treating clinically compatible cases, while public health authorities should expand surveillance efforts for these emerging infections.

Indexed as

AnaplasmaAnimalsCamelusCattleFemaleGoatsHorsesHumansLivestockMaleMongoliaRickettsiaSeroepidemiologic StudiesSheepSpotted Fever Group RickettsiosisTick-Borne DiseasesAnaplasmaMongoliaRickettsiaSeroprevalenceTick-borne disease

Identifiers

PMID29054570
PMCPMC5671362
OpenAlexW2766451022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.