Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29054291›Full record

ReviewProgress in brain research2017

Neuroscience-informed psychoeducation for addiction medicine: A neurocognitive perspective.

Hamed Ekhtiari, Tara Rezapour, Robin L Aupperle, Martin P Paulus

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Progress in brain research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Hamed EkhtiariLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, United States; Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Electronic address: hekhtiari@laureateinstitute.org.
Tara RezapourIranian National Center for Addiction Studies, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Translational Neuroscience Program, Institute for Cognitive Science Studies, Tehran, Iran.
Robin L AupperleLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, United States; School of Community Medicine, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, United States.
Martin P PaulusLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, United States.
Institute for Cognitive Science Studies · IRLaureate Institute for Brain Research · USTehran University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity of Tulsa · US

Funding

Approach-Avoidance Conflict-a multi-level predictor for exposure therapy responseK23MH108707 · NIMH · LAUREATE INSTITUTE FOR BRAIN RESEARCH · PI AUPPERLE, ROBIN L · 2016 to 2020
$976k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH108707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychoeducation (PE) is defined as an intervention with systematic, structured, and didactic knowledge transfer for an illness and its treatment, integrating emotional and motivational aspects to enable patients to cope with the illness and to improve its treatment adherence and efficacy. PE is considered an important component of treatment in both medical and psychiatric disorders, especially for mental health disorders associated with lack of insight, such as alcohol and substance use disorders (ASUDs). New advancements in neuroscience have shed light on how various aspects of ASUDs may relate to neural processes. However, the actual impact of neuroscience in the real-life clinical practice of addiction medicine is minimal. In this chapter, we provide a perspective on how PE in addiction medicine can be informed by neuroscience in two dimensions: content (knowledge we transfer in PE) and structure (methods we use to deliver PE). The content of conventional PE targets knowledge about etiology of illness, treatment process, adverse effects of prescribed medications, coping strategies, family education, and life skill training. Adding neuroscience evidence to the content of PE could be helpful in communicating not only the impact of drug use but also the beneficial impact of various treatments (i.e., on brain function), thus enhancing motivation for compliance and further destigmatizing their symptoms. PE can also be optimized in its "structure" by implicitly and explicitly engaging different neurocognitive processes, including salience/attention, memory, and self-awareness. There are many interactions between these two dimensions, structure and content, in the delivery of neuroscience-informed psychoeducation (NIPE). We explore these interactions in the development of a cartoon-based NIPE to promote brain recovery during addiction treatment as a part of the brain awareness for addiction recovery initiative.

Indexed as

Addiction MedicineNeurosciencesBehavior, AddictiveHumansPsychotherapyAddictionCartoonMetacognitiveNeurosciencePsychoeducationSelfTraining

Identifiers

PMID29054291
PMCPMC5771228
OpenAlexW2763462689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.