Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29054089›Full record

SynthesisEnvironmental research2018

Molecular characterization of Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii from environmental sources and genetic comparison with clinical isolates in Apulia, Italy.

Maria Teresa Montagna, Antonella De Donno, Giuseppina Caggiano, Francesca Serio, Osvalda De Giglio, Francesco Bagordo, R D'Amicis, Shawn R Lockhart, Massimo Cogliati

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Environmental research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Environmental Status ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cryptococcus gattii VGII isolated from native forest and river in Northern Brazil.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2019
    Article
  11. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2019
    Article
  12. Frontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maria Teresa MontagnaDepartment of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, University of Bari 'Aldo Moro', Bari, Italy.
Antonella De DonnoDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science and Technology, University of Salento, Lecce, Italy.
Giuseppina CaggianoDepartment of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, University of Bari 'Aldo Moro', Bari, Italy. Electronic address: giuseppina.caggiano@uniba.it.
Francesca SerioDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science and Technology, University of Salento, Lecce, Italy.
Osvalda De GiglioDepartment of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, University of Bari 'Aldo Moro', Bari, Italy.
Francesco BagordoDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science and Technology, University of Salento, Lecce, Italy.
R D'AmicisDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.
Shawn R LockhartFungal Reference Laboratory, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Massimo CogliatiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study investigated the environmental distribution of Cryptococcus neoformans and C. gattii species complex molecular types, mating types and sequence types in Apulia, a region of Southern Italy. A total of 2078 specimens from arboreal and animal sources were analyzed. The percentage of positive samples was similar among both arboreal and animal specimens: 4.2% vs. 5.1% for C. neoformans species complex and 0.6% vs. 1.4% for C. gattii species complex. Molecular typing identified 78 isolates as VNI (76 αA and two aA), one as AD-hybrid αADa, and 16 as VGI aB. VNI isolates presented 10 different sequence types (STs) and VGI isolates two. The most frequent STs among C. neoformans and C. gattii species complex isolates were ST23 (51%) and ST156 (90%), respectively. Comparison with molecular types and STs results obtained from 21 clinical isolates collected in Apulia showed that one C. neoformans VNI clinical isolate shared an identical sequence type of one arboreal isolate (ST61) and that one C. gattii VGI clinical isolate matched with the main ST (ST156) present in the environment. In addition, molecular type VNIV was found only among clinical isolates and was absent in the investigated environmental area. In conclusion, the present study identified which C. neoformans and C. gattii species complex genotypes are circulating in Apulia, defined their ecological niches and revealed the relationship with clinical cases. It represents a basal study for addressing future investigations and public health interventions in the region.

Indexed as

AnimalsCryptococcosisCryptococcus gattiiCryptococcus neoformansEnvironmental MonitoringHumansItalyPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID29054089
PMCPMC12010143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.