Observational studyInternational forum of allergy & rhinology2017
Investigating the minimal clinically important difference for SNOT-22 symptom domains in surgically managed chronic rhinosinusitis.
Observational study in International forum of allergy & rhinology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
61 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy of biologic agents in patients with comorbid asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026Pooled it
- Chinese herbal therapy in the management of rhinosinusitis-A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Definition and characteristics of acute exacerbation in adult patients with chronic rhinosinusitis: a systematic review.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale · 2020Pooled it
- Timing of Surgery and Outcomes in Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Narrative Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-facialePooled it
- A Novel Device to Improve the Tolerability of Intranasal Corticosteroid Sprays for Allergic Rhinitis and Postoperative Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Crossover Trial.Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Mepolizumab improvements in health-related quality of life and disease symptoms in a patient population with very severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: psychometric and efficacy analyses from the SYNAPSE study.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2023Trial
- Predictive factors of a beneficial quality of life outcome in patients undergoing primary sinonasal surgery: a population-based prospective cohort study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2018Trial
- Longitudinal SNOT-22 Symptom Changes With Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT).The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
- Longitudinal Changes in Nasal Airflow and Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Acoustic Nasal Therapy: A Pilot Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Radiofrequency ablation for inferior turbinate hypertrophy in patients with rhinitis medicamentosa.Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology · 2026Article
- More than a drink: The behavioral impact of alcohol sensitivity in AERD.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2026Article
- Could Dupilumab Improve Sleep Quality in CRSwNP Patients: Myth or Reality? A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Preoperative Pollen Exposure and Chronic Rhinosinusitis Outcomes After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Pilot Investigation.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2026Article
- Olfactory Outcomes After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyposis.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2026Article
- CRSwNP in the biologics era: evaluating patient-reported quality of life outcomes.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Review
- The Impact of Chronic Particulate Matter Exposure on Quality-of-Life Outcomes After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2025Article
- Factors Influencing Outcome After Frontal Beak Reduction-Does the Surgical Tool Matter?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Impact of Biologics on Nasal Symptoms in Severe Asthmatics: Findings From the PRISM Study.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2025Article
1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrior work has described 5 domains within the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcomes Test (SNOT-22) that allow for stratification of symptoms into similar clusters and that can be used to direct therapy. Although the outcomes of various interventions on these symptom domains have been reported, minimal clinically important difference (MCID) values have not been investigated, which has limited clinical interpretation of these results.
methodsThis study was designed as a secondary analysis of a prospective, multi-institutional, observational cohort. A total of 276 patients with medically refractory CRS who underwent surgical management were enrolled. Distribution-based methods (half-standard deviation, standard error of measurement, Cohen's d, and the minimum detectable change) were used to compute MCID values for both SNOT-22 total and domain scores. The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 6D (SF-6D) health utility score was used to operationalize anchor-based associations using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
resultsThe mean MCID of several distribution-based methods for total SNOT-22 scores was 9.0, in agreement with previously published metrics. Average MCID values for the rhinologic, extranasal rhinologic, ear/facial, psychological, and sleep domain scores were 3.8, 2.4, 3.2, 3.9, and 2.9, respectively. Anchor-based approaches with the SF-6D did not have strong predictive accuracy across total SNOT-22 scores or domains (ROC areas under-the-curve ≤ 0.71), indicating weak associations between improvement in SNOT-22 scores and health utility as measured by the SF-6D.
conclusionThis estimation of MCID values for the SNOT-22 symptom domains allows for improved clinical interpretation of results from past, present, and future rhinologic outcomes research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.