Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29053832›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2017

Reward deficits in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia include insensitivity to negative stimuli.

David C Perry, Samir Datta, Virginia E Sturm, Kristie A Wood, Jessica Zakrzewski, William W Seeley, Bruce L Miller, Joel H Kramer, Howard J Rosen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Structural and functional correlates of olfactory reward processing in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Inappropriate trusting behaviour in dementia.Frontiers in neurology · 2024
    Article
  7. Altered reward processing underpins emotional apathy in dementia.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Frontotemporal Dementia: A Window to Alexithymia.The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Altered phobic reactions in frontotemporal dementia: A behavioural and neuroanatomical analysis.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David C PerryDepartment of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Samir DattaDepartment of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Virginia E SturmDepartment of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Kristie A WoodDepartment of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Jessica ZakrzewskiDepartment of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
William W SeeleyDepartment of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Bruce L MillerDepartment of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Joel H KramerDepartment of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Howard J RosenDepartment of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

TDP-43 Loss-of-Function: Biology to BiomarkersP01AG019724 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BRUCE L MILLER · 2002 to 2026
$67.2M
The Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Neuroimaging InitiativeR01AG032306 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ROSEN, HOWARD J · 2009 to 2013
$10.0M
Emotion network dysfunction and decline in early frontotemporal dementiaR01AG052496 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Virginia Emily Sturm · 2017 to 2026
$6.9M
Decision-Making in Genetic FTDR01AG022983 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CHIONG, WINSTON · 2004 to 2021
$6.0M
Multimodal Imaging in Frontotemporal DegenerationK24AG045333 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ROSEN, HOWARD J · 2013 to 2023
$1.9M
Awareness of Deficits in DementiaR01AG030688 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ROSEN, HOWARD J · 2010 to 2014
$1.5M
Reward processing in frontotemporal dementiaK23AG045289 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI PERRY, DAVID C · 2014 to 2018
$880k
Identifying the Neural Basis and Functional Role of Emotional Empathy in DementiaK23AG040127 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI STURM, VIRGINIA EMILY · 2012 to 2016
$713k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG040127NIA NIH HHS K23 AG045289NIA NIH HHS K24 AG045333NIA NIH HHS P01 AG019724NIA NIH HHS R01 AG022983NIA NIH HHS R01 AG030688NIA NIH HHS R01 AG032306NIA NIH HHS R01 AG052496
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During reward processing individuals weigh positive and negative features of a stimulus to determine whether they will pursue or avoid it. Though patients with behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia display changes in their pursuit of rewards, such as food, alcohol, money, and sex, the basis for these shifts is not clearly established. In particular, it is unknown whether patients' behaviour results from excessive focus on rewards, insensitivity to punishment, or to dysfunction in a particular stage of reward processing, such as anticipation, consumption, or action selection. Our goal was to determine the nature of the reward deficit in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia and its underlying anatomy. We devised a series of tasks involving pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral olfactory stimuli, designed to separate distinct phases of reward processing. In a group of 25 patients with behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia and 21 control subjects, diagnosis by valence interactions revealed that patients with behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia rated unpleasant odours as less aversive than did controls and displayed lower skin conductance responses when anticipating an upcoming aversive odour. Subjective pleasantness ratings and skin conductance responses did not differ between behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia and controls for pleasant or neutral smells. In a task designed to measure the effort subjects would expend to smell or avoid smelling a stimulus, patients with behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia were less motivated, and therefore less successful than control subjects, at avoiding what they preferred not to smell, but had equivalent success at obtaining stimuli they found rewarding. Voxel-based morphometry of patients with behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia revealed that the inability to subjectively differentiate the valence of pleasant and unpleasant odours correlated with atrophy in right ventral mid-insula and right amygdala. High pleasantness ratings of unpleasant stimuli correlated with left dorsal anterior insula and frontal pole atrophy. These findings indicate that insensitivity to negative information may be a key component of the reward-seeking behaviours in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia, and may relate to degeneration of structures that are involved in representing the emotional salience of sensory information.

Indexed as

RewardAgedAmygdalaAtrophyBrainCase-Control StudiesCerebral CortexFemaleFrontal LobeFrontotemporal DementiaGalvanic Skin ResponseHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedOdorantsfrontotemporal dementiapsychophysiologyreward

Identifiers

PMID29053832
PMCPMC5841034
OpenAlexW2761122304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.