Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29053656›Full record

Observational studyMedicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal2017

Is it necessary to alter anticoagulation therapy for tooth extraction in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants?

M Caliskan, H-C Tükel, M-E Benlidayi, A Deniz

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04846114 (Efficacy of Local Hemostatic Management in Implant Surgery in Anticoagulated Patients on Warfarin), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04846114 nacompletednot on this map

Efficacy of Local Hemostatic Management in Implant Surgery in Anticoagulated Patients on Warfarin: a Randomized Clinical Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorJorge Ernesto AguilarRan2016 to 2019Enrolled71ConditionsOral Anticoagulant TherapyArmsDental implant surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Clinical features and risk factors of patients with oral bleeding in dental emergency].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Dental extractions on direct oral anticoagulants vs. warfarin: The DENTST study.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M CaliskanOral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Cukurova University, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ağiz ve Çene Cerrahisi ABD, 01330 Sariçam, Adana, Türkiye, cantukel@gmail.com.
H-C Tükel
M-E Benlidayi
A Deniz
Cukurova University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe number of patients using direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) instead of vitamin K antagonists (VKA) is increasing and there is limited data on the safety of tooth extractions in patients taking DOACs. The aim of this study was to compare the amount of bleeding (AOB) and postoperative complications after tooth extractions between patients taking VKAs and patients taking DOACs without altering the anticoaguation therapy. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe study consisted of four groups: Direct thrombin inhibitor group, factor Xa inhibitor group, warfarin group and a control group. A single tooth was extracted in each patient and routine coagulation test values were recorded prior to extraction. AOB was measured for 20 minutes after tooth extraction. The patients were evaluated on 2nd and 7th days after extraction for bleeding. Status of bleeding was classified as no bleeding, mild bleeding controlled by gauze pads, moderate bleeding controlled by hemostatic agents and severe bleeding required hospitalization. Analysis of variance, chi square test and correlation analysis were used for statistical analysis of data.

resultsA total of 84 patients (48 male, 36 female) were included in this study. The mean age of patients was 57 (38-87) years. Mean AOB was 1388.6±913.0, 1909.29±1063.1, 3673±1415.4, 1593.33±672.5 mg for direct thrombin inhibitor, factor Xa inhibitor, warfarin and control groups respectively. Mean AOB was significantly higher for warfarin group, compared to other groups (p<0.05). The number of patients showing mild and moderate bleeding was significantly higher in warfarin group compared to other groups on the 2nd postextraction day (p=0.001). No bleeding was occurred in control group on 2nd and 7th postextraction days and no bleeding was occurred in direct thrombin inhibitor group on 7th postextraction day. The number of bleeding events among groups was not statistically significant on 7th postextraction day (p=0.251).

conclusionsPatients taking warfarin had more bleeding compared to patients taking direct oral anticoagulants after tooth extractions. In patients taking direct oral anticoagulants simple tooth extractions can be safely carried out without altering the anticaogulant regimen with the use of local hemostatic agents.

Indexed as

Tooth ExtractionAdministration, OralAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnticoagulantsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative HemorrhageProspective StudiesVitamin KAnticoagulantsVitamin K

Identifiers

PMID29053656
PMCPMC5813996
OpenAlexW2766146065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.