Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29053382›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 532019

Benchmarking Treatment Adherence and Therapist Competence in Individual Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment for Youth Anxiety Disorders.

Bryce D McLeod, Michael A Southam-Gerow, Amanda Jensen-Doss, Aaron Hogue, Philip C Kendall, John R Weisz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Content of Usual Clinical Care for Youth with Primary Anxiety Problems.Administration and policy in mental health · 2025
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Treatment Fidelity and Outcome in CBT for Youth with Autism: The MEYA Fidelity Scale.Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53
    Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Proposing a Mechanistic Model of Clinician Training and Consultation.Clinical psychology : a publication of the Division of Clinical Psychology of the American Psychological Association · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Effectiveness and Efficiency of Observationally Assessing Fidelity to a Family-Centered Child Intervention: A Quasi-Experimental Study.Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Bryce D McLeoda Department of Psychology , Virginia Commonwealth University.
Michael A Southam-Gerowa Department of Psychology , Virginia Commonwealth University.
Amanda Jensen-Dossb Department of Psychology , University of Miami.
Aaron Hoguec The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse.
Philip C Kendalld Department of Psychology , Temple University.
John R Weisze Department of Psychology , Harvard University.
Virginia Commonwealth University · USHarvard University · USNational Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University · USTemple University · USUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

Development and Validation of Child Therapy Integrity MeasuresR01MH086529 · NIMH · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI MCLEOD, BRYCE DOUGLAS, SOUTHAM-GEROW, MICHAEL A · 2010 to 2014
$1.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH086529
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence-based treatments (EBTs) for youth are typically developed and established through studies in research settings designed to ensure treatment integrity, that is, protocol adherence and competence by therapists. An important question for implementation science is how well integrity is maintained when these EBTs are delivered in community settings. The present study investigated whether the integrity achieved by therapists in community settings achieved a benchmark set by therapists in a research setting when they delivered the same EBT-an individual cognitive-behavioral treatment (ICBT) for youth anxiety. Therapists (N = 29; 68.97% White; 13.79% male) provided ICBT to 68 youths (M age = 10.60 years, SD = 2.03; 82.35% White; 52.94% male) diagnosed with a principal anxiety disorder in research or community settings. Training and supervision protocols were the same across settings. Two independent teams of trained coders rated 744 sessions using observational instruments designed to assess ICBT adherence and competence. Both adherence and competence were higher in the research setting. Group differences in competence were consistent across treatment, but differences in adherence were most pronounced when treatment shifted to exposure, widely viewed as the most critical component of ICBT. When using the benchmarks from the research setting, therapists from the community settings fell short for indices of adherence and competence. However, given differences between therapists and clients, as well as the fact that treatment outcomes were similar across settings, our findings raise questions about whether it is appropriate to use treatment integrity benchmarks from research settings for community.

Indexed as

Anxiety DisordersBenchmarkingChildCognitive Behavioral TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMental CompetencyTreatment Adherence and ComplianceTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID29053382
PMCPMC6113104
OpenAlexW2766723023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.