ArticleHealth services research2018
Providing Family Planning Services at Primary Care Organizations after the Exclusion of Planned Parenthood from Publicly Funded Programs in Texas: Early Qualitative Evidence.
Article in Health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Implementing Title X: policy design, administration, and geographic access to care.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- Use of preferred contraceptive method among young adults in Texas and California: A comparison by state and insurance coverage.PloS one · 2023Article
- Evidence-based family planning services among publicly funded providers in Texas.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- The impact of policy changes from the perspective of providers of family planning care in the US: results from a qualitative study.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2022Article
- Facilitators of and Barriers to Successful Implementation of the One Key QuestionWomen's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2022Article
- Differences in abortion rates by race-ethnicity after implementation of a restrictive Texas law.Contraception · 2020Article
- Availability of Confidential Services for Teens Declined After the 2011-2013 Changes to Publicly Funded Family Planning Programs in Texas.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2020Article
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice of family planning services among healthcare workers in Kashmir - A cross-sectional study.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2019Article
- Counseling and referrals for women with unplanned pregnancies at publicly funded family planning organizations in Texas.Contraception · 2019Article
- Low-Income Texas Women's Experiences Accessing Their Desired Contraceptive Method at the First Postpartum Visit.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2018Article
- Implementation of Title X Family Planning Services in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study of a Primary Care Network in Georgia.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's HealthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo explore organizations' experiences providing family planning during the first year of an expanded primary care program in Texas. DATA SOURCES: Between November 2014 and February 2015, in-depth interviews were conducted with program administrators at 30 organizations: 7 women's health organizations, 13 established primary care contractors (e.g., community health centers, public health departments), and 10 new primary care contractors. STUDY
designInterviews addressed organizational capacities to expand family planning and integrate services with primary care. DATA EXTRACTION: Interview transcripts were analyzed using a theme-based approach. Themes were compared across the three types of organizations. PRINCIPAL
findingsEstablished and new primary care contractors identified several challenges expanding family planning services, which were uncommon among women's health organizations. Clinicians often lacked training to provide intrauterine devices and contraceptive implants. Organizations often recruited existing clients into family planning services, rather than expanding their patient base, and new contractors found family planning difficult to integrate because of clients' other health needs. Primary care contractors frequently described contraceptive provision protocols that were not evidence-based.
conclusionsMany primary care organizations in Texas initially lacked the capacity to provide evidence-based family planning services that women's health organizations already provided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.