Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29053169›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2018

Whole body physiologically based modelling of β-blockers in the rat: events in tissues and plasma following an i.v. bolus dose.

S Y A Cheung, T Rodgers, L Aarons, I Gueorguieva, G L Dickinson, S Murby, C Brown, B Collins, M Rowland

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 86% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Microsphere-loaded dual-responseJournal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

S Y A CheungQuantitative Clinical Pharmacology, Early Clinical Development, iMED AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
T RodgersIcon Development Solutions, Manchester, UK.
L AaronsCentre for Applied Pharmacokinetic Research, Manchester Pharmacy School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2704-6570
I GueorguievaEli Lilly, Surrey, UK.
G L DickinsonEli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
S MurbyCentre for Applied Pharmacokinetic Research, Manchester Pharmacy School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
C BrownRedx Pharma, Macclesfield, UK.
B CollinsCentre for Applied Pharmacokinetic Research, Manchester Pharmacy School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
M RowlandCentre for Applied Pharmacokinetic Research, Manchester Pharmacy School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
University of Manchester · GBAstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GBEli Lilly (United Kingdom) · GBEli Lilly (United States) · USRedx Pharma (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeWhole body physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models have been increasingly applied in drug development to describe kinetic events of therapeutic agents in animals and humans. The advantage of such modelling is the ability to incorporate vast amounts of physiological information, such as organ blood flow and volume, to ensure that the model is as close to reality as possible. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Previous PBPK model development of enantiomers of a series of seven racemic β-blockers, namely, acebutolol, betaxolol, bisoprolol, metoprolol, oxprenolol, pindolol and propranolol, together with S-timolol in rat was based on tissue and blood concentration data at steady state. Compounds were administered in several cassettes with the composition mix and blood and tissue sampling times determined using a D-optimal design. KEY

resultsClosed-loop PBPK models were developed initially based on the application of open loop forcing function models to individual tissues and compounds. For the majority of compounds and tissues, distribution kinetics was adequately characterized by perfusion rate-limited models. For some compounds in the testes and gut, a permeability rate-limited distribution model was required to best fit the data. Parameter estimates of the tissue-to-blood partition coefficient through fitting of individual enantiomers and of racemic pair were generally in agreement and also concur with those from previous steady-state experiments. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: PBPK modelling is a very powerful tool to aid drug discovery and development of therapeutic agents in animals and humans. However, careful consideration of the assumptions made during the modelling exercise is essential.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAnimalsInjections, IntravenousMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyTissue DistributionAdrenergic beta-Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID29053169
PMCPMC5740248
OpenAlexW2765189811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.