ArticleHerz2019
[Heart valve disesases : How sufficient is the knowledge of the German population?]
Article in Herz, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Heart Valve Disease Awareness Survey 2017: what did we achieve since 2015?Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2019Article
- Patient Disposition and Clinical Outcome After Referral to a Dedicated TAVI Clinic.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the awareness and knowledge of the German population regarding diseases in general, a survey of 1446 people aged 60 years or older was conducted in 14 German towns. The focus was on heart valve diseases with special emphasis on aortic valve stenosis (AS). While cancer was the disease that respondents were most concerned about (25.2%), only 3.3% were concerned about heart valve diseases. In this respect, the knowledge was broadly limited: only 7.4% of participants claimed to have some familiarity with heart valve diseases and only 12.5% could correctly describe the symptoms of AS. Even so, 35.0% of the participants could correctly name the number of human heart valves, 71.6% knew at least one therapy option for AS and 30.6% were familiar with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). After providing a brief clarification of the prevalence, symptoms and course of AS, 45.6% of respondents were more concerned about the condition, 15.7% wanted to know more about the symptoms of AS and 4.7% even recognized the typical symptoms in themselves. Most of the participants would like to seek more information preferably in discussion with a specialist physician (77.2%), with their general practitioner (43.2%) or using the internet (29.7%). Despite its high prevalence, high morbidity and mortality, the vast majority of the German population were neither concerned nor fully aware of treatment options for AS. There is a strong case for public awareness campaigns that provide better knowledge of AS, and support check-ups that enable timely treatment and the avoidance of unnecessary hospitalization and death.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.